Teams

McMullen Halm

2023 Pinellas Combo 18 & Over Summer · 7.5 M Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-09vs Countryside WalkerWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshton Fritz / Brandon Halm vs Dane Houston / Michael Vanhorenbeck6-4, 6-1
2023-08-26vs RCSP FantauzzoLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Ashton Fritz vs James Price / Jamie Dennis5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJonathan Mellen / Johnny Fung vs Steven Friedman / Scott Rogers3-6, 4-6
2023-08-12vs Pinellas/Hollingsworth/18&Over7.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesAshton Fritz / Paul Solorzano vs Daren McGovern / Jack Korta1-6, 1-6
2023-07-29vs RCSP FantauzzoWon 10
W#2 DoublesAshton Fritz / Andrew DePasquale vs Douglas Hicks / Jamie Dennis6-2, 6-3
2023-07-15vs Pinellas/Hollingsworth/18&Over7.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshton Fritz / Brandon Halm vs Daren McGovern / Brian Williams4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFelix Herrera / Andrew DePasquale vs Bob Murdock / Jack Korta2-6, 1-6
2023-07-08vs Seminole Lake Dsa 7.5 MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohnny Fung / Jonathan Mellen vs John Hockin / Carlos Rodriguez4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Ashton Fritz
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Johnny Fung
published
3.44
Brandon Halm
published 3.5
3.41
Garrett Prochaska
published
3.32
Mony Rodon
published
3.31
Andrew DePasquale
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Chi Ming Yu
published 3.5
3.24
YOUNES HAMDI
published
3.02
Paul Solorzano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
George Hawkins
published
Jonathan Mellen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew DePasquale + Paul Solorzano191851% games−3.0% vs expected
Jonathan Mellen + Ashton Fritz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashton Fritz
62W–56L career · 5 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Johnny Fung
26W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Brandon Halm
25W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
Garrett Prochaska
25W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Mony Rodon
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Andrew DePasquale
105W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Chi Ming Yu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
YOUNES HAMDI
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Paul Solorzano
69W–49L career · 1 line in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
George Hawkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jonathan Mellen
63W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.