Teams

St. Marlo (Jacqueline Atkinson)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.5 Women (Elena Cosper)

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-07-07vs St Ives (Talley Richey)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Atkinson / Helen Kim vs Julie Feltes / Misti Howie2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTina Skees / Ann Rithmyxay vs Colleen Scruggs / Renee Miller1-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesShirlee Brewer / Sharon Rupert vs Lyn Reaves / Lindsay Agnos1-6, 3-5
2026-06-30vs GAC (Jennifer Crisp)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Atkinson / Helen Kim vs Jennifer Crisp / Sharon Hoffman6-7, 6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSusie Anders / Ann Rithmyxay vs Annabelle Townsend / Jenny Stinchcomb1-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesDeborah Bell / Dawn Kelleher vs Emily Joiner / Jennifer Tiberia6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women (Elena Cosper) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Christy Maguire
published 3.5
Cathy Pham
published 3.5
3.24
Jacqueline Atkinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Ann Rithmyxay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Krista Barley
published
3.02
Kelly Zambetti
published
2.94
Sharon Rupert
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Natacha Santoro
published
Cindy Tan
published 3
2.73
Deborah Bell
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
Heather Desrochers
published
Karen Kress
published
Marcy Blochowiak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Maguire + Jacqueline Atkinson213 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Bell + Kelly Zambetti123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christy Maguire
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Cathy Pham
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jacqueline Atkinson
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Ann Rithmyxay
19W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Krista Barley
28W–19L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Kelly Zambetti
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Sharon Rupert
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94
Natacha Santoro
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Cindy Tan
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Deborah Bell
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Heather Desrochers
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Kress
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcy Blochowiak
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.