Teams

For The Love

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY · Ladies 3.5 18s

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2020-10-29vs 40LuvLost 14
L#1 DoublesTina Bellings / Diane Hamilton vs Alli Carr / Teresa Koplyay6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLisa Shields vs Kaori Hornbaker2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Cameron / Susan Kinard vs Astrid Mohn / Gail Wells6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKelly Towne vs Christina Gaylor2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLou Ann Davis / Tre' McCalister vs Jennifer Gray / Teri Paxton6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2020-10-22vs Net WorthWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Fitzpatrick / Anne Spross vs Melissa Berndt / Liz Stringer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Shields / Tre' McCalister vs Annie Yu / MaryBeth Kenis6-2, 6-1
2020-10-01vs Net WorthLost 23
L#1 DoublesChristine Fitzpatrick / Nikki Grossman vs Karen Fountain / Holly Park1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAnne Spross vs Annie Candee0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Shields / Tina Bellings vs Megan Hamilton / Michele Zimmer6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTre' McCalister vs LIZA CAL MAYOR6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKelly Towne / Pearl Fields vs Wendy Lancaster / Amy Fahrlander3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 3.5 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Lindsay Buchholz
published
3.62
Tina Bellings
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Tre' McCalister
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.28
Nikki Grossman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Allison Hawkins
published 3.5
Anne Spross
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Emily Alexander
published 3.5
3.23
Lisa Monti
published
3.22
Melissa Cameron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Kristina Lackey
published
3.06
Lisa Shields
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Kelly Towne
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Rebecca Reese
published
3.02
Delia Foster
published 3.5
Mary Faseler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Spross + Tina Bellings6260% games+14.4% vs expected
Lindsay Buchholz + Kristina Lackey5451% games+8.6% vs expected
Lisa Monti + Tre' McCalister7358% games+7.6% vs expected
Nikki Grossman + Kristina Lackey4254% games+4.1% vs expected
Nikki Grossman + Tre' McCalister17955% games+2.5% vs expected
Tre' McCalister + Kristina Lackey2348% games+1.8% vs expected
Lisa Monti + Nikki Grossman3349% games−0.8% vs expected
Delia Foster + Tre' McCalister10450% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Buchholz
45W–14L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Tina Bellings
32W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Tre' McCalister
65W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
Nikki Grossman
42W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Allison Hawkins
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Anne Spross
19W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Emily Alexander
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Monti
24W–16L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Melissa Cameron
11W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.22
Kristina Lackey
48W–43L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Lisa Shields
23W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
Kelly Towne
52W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Rebecca Reese
16W–35L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Delia Foster
19W–29L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
Mary Faseler
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.