Teams

Kline - Lawn and Tennis

2026 Sandhills Summer Singles Adult 18 & over · 2.5 Adult Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-31vs Riney - Pinehurst No. 9Won 30
W#1 SinglesSusan Lindamood vs Nicole Peterson6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJulia Rivera vs Lindsay Riney6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesYvette Sparks vs Stacey Gahagan6-4, 6-3
2026-07-27Won 21
W#1 SinglesSusan Lindamood vs Jessica Smith6-0, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJulia Rivera vs Anna Owen4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesYvette Sparks vs Lauren Warren6-4, 6-4
2026-07-20vs Riney - Pinehurst No. 9Won 21
W#1 SinglesSusan Lindamood vs Kristie Verrilli6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKatia Weaver vs Kimberly Maloney6-2, 7-5
L#3 SinglesAlexandria Romano vs Nicole Peterson2-6, 1-6
2026-07-09vs McFayden - Highland Country ClubLost 12
L#1 SinglesJustine Iskrzycki vs Nisha Patel3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKatia Weaver vs Victoria Stout6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesValerie Kline vs Anna Owen5-7, 4-6
2026-06-22vs Riney - Pinehurst No. 9Won 21
W#1 SinglesKatia Weaver vs Kristie Verrilli4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAlexandria Romano vs Lindsay Riney6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJulia Rivera vs Kimberly Maloney4-6, 4-6
2026-06-08vs McFayden - Highland Country ClubLost 03
L#1 SinglesSusan Lindamood vs Nisha Patel0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJustine Iskrzycki vs Madeline McFadyen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesYvette Sparks vs Kenly Dine1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McFayden - Highland Country Club4212613133
2Kline - Lawn and Tennis4210817146
3Riney - Pinehurst No. 91551327185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Katia Weaver
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.44
Susan Lindamood
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.37
Justine Iskrzycki
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.36
Julia Rivera
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.32
Valerie Kline
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.29
Alexandria Romano
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.13
Yvette Sparks
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katia Weaver
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%12%88%
2.66
Susan Lindamood
16W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.44
Justine Iskrzycki
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Julia Rivera
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.36
Valerie Kline
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
2.5
Alexandria Romano
5W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Yvette Sparks
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.