Teams

Broward/Veltri - Koon

2022 Broward Adult 40 & Over Day · 4.0 Adult Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-17vs Ltc - LevineSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVladlena Funk / Maria Montoto vs Connie Rivera / Maria Moreno4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoan S Oelschlager / Margaret MacHoian vs Laurie Mathews / Loren Levine2-6, 4-6
2022-03-10vs Veltri - Gonzalez/ContrerasWon 31
W#1 DoublesVladlena Funk / Maria Montoto vs Paulina Riveros / Rosana Fernandez7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMargaret MacHoian vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGloria Coursey / Clarena Furtado vs Sarah Nickoson / Sigal Sasson6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLou Armstrong / Lorena Villar vs Zorayda Hidalgo / Rosana Renzi6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-03-03vs Ltc - LevineWon 21
L#1 DoublesVladlena Funk / Ivy Touchstone vs Michele King / Loren Levine3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesIna Gluck / Maria Montoto vs Maria Moreno / Svetlana Janglin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGloria Coursey / Clarena Furtado vs Bea Tully / Yonghong Chen6-2, 6-3
2022-02-17vs Veltri - Gonzalez/ContrerasWon 30
W#1 DoublesClarena Furtado / Ivy Touchstone vs Cheryl Bonno / Camille Aponte6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLou Armstrong / Lorena Villar vs Zorayda Hidalgo / Rossana OKAMURA6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJoan S Oelschlager / Margaret MacHoian vs Ana Carolina Manchester / Garbine de la Mora7-5, 6-3
2022-02-10vs Ltc - LevineWon 31
W#1 DoublesGloria Coursey / Clarena Furtado vs Loren Levine / Connie Rivera6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesIna Gluck / Maria Montoto vs Elisabeth Weiss / Bea Tully6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesIvy Touchstone / Vladlena Funk vs Laurie Mathews / Angelica Baez3-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesLou Armstrong / Julianna Dudics vs ELIZABETH GORDILLO / Edith Schmidt6-1, 6-3
2022-01-27vs Veltri - Gonzalez/ContrerasWon 31
W#1 DoublesGloria Coursey / Clarena Furtado vs Sarah Nickoson / Maria Galvan Leeper6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaria Montoto / Lorena Villar vs Zorayda Hidalgo / Rossana OKAMURA5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLou Armstrong / Ina Gluck vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Cheryl Bonno5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#4 DoublesVladlena Funk / Ivy Touchstone vs Natalia de Gregorio - * / Paulina Riveros7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-01-20vs Ltc - LevineWon 31
L#1 DoublesLou Armstrong / Joan S Oelschlager vs ELIZABETH GORDILLO / Maria Moreno4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesClarena Furtado / Gloria Coursey vs Sahar Moghaddam / Sandra Bazain7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLorena Villar / Ivy Touchstone vs Loren Levine / Frances Cubano6-4, 6-2
W#4 DoublesMaria Montoto / Ina Gluck vs Connie Rivera / Bea Tully6-1, 6-0
2022-01-06vs Veltri - Gonzalez/ContrerasWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Guest / Lou Armstrong vs Kerri Paul / Sarah Nickoson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIvy Touchstone / Lorena Villar vs Ana Carolina Manchester / Sigal Sasson6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#4 DoublesClarena Furtado / Gloria Coursey vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Zorayda Hidalgo6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Gloria Coursey
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.03
Ivy Touchstone
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Maria Montoto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.93
Suzanne Siegler
published
3.80
Ina Gluck
published 4
3.79
Lorena Villar
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Margaret MacHoian
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.65
Clarena Furtado
published 4
3.61
Lou Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Kathy Koon
published
Joan S Oelschlager
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gloria Coursey + Ivy Touchstone7554% games+2.7% vs expected
Ivy Touchstone + Maria Montoto11455% games−3.0% vs expected
Lou Armstrong + Lorena Villar5651% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Coursey + Lorena Villar3250% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Villar + Ivy Touchstone3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gloria Coursey
103W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Ivy Touchstone
129W–82L career · 6 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Maria Montoto
252W–120L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.98
Suzanne Siegler
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.93
4
Ina Gluck
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Lorena Villar
207W–130L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Margaret MacHoian
29W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Clarena Furtado
12W–15L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Lou Armstrong
61W–85L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Kathy Koon
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Joan S Oelschlager
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.