Teams

Strickland 40 3.0

2025 Fall 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 · 3.0 Adult 40 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-24vs Howton- FALL24Lost 12
W#1 DoublesStacey Strickland / Monica Moon vs Carol Baron / Debbie Peak2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMelissa Aycock vs April Howton4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRita Fisher / Melissa Hargett vs Sheary McLendon / Rebecca Hall1-6, 1-6
2024-11-17vs Wingo 40+ 3.0 FALLLost 04
L#1 DoublesStacey Strickland / Bethany Honey vs Sandra Hollis / Stacy Creel7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMelissa Aycock vs Donna Murray3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPaula Pounders / Jill Archer vs Kim Tompkins / Sherri Henderson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRita Fisher / Heather Willis vs Amy Garrett / Janie Hillis2-6, 1-6
2024-11-11vs Wingo 40+ 3.0 FALLLost 13
L#1 DoublesStacey Strickland / Paula Pounders vs Stacy Creel / Kim Tompkins2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLaura Kroeger vs Stephonie McCrory3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Archer / Monica Moon vs Sherri Henderson / Amanda Gooch1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Willis / Melissa Aycock vs Donna Murray / Janie Hillis1-6, 3-6
2024-11-07vs Howton- FALL24Lost 04
L#1 DoublesBethany Honey / Melissa Hargett vs Debbie Haythorn / Jane Chasan4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Aycock vs April Howton0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRita Fisher / Laura Butler vs Kim Azeem / Stacy Morgan0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Pounders / Heather Willis vs Donna Ellison / Dawn Sparks4-6, 2-6
2024-10-21vs Wingo 40+ 3.0 FALLLost 13
L#1 DoublesMelissa Hargett / Stacey Strickland vs Beth Fennel / Tanya Baugh6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesLaura Kroeger vs Janie Hillis7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRita Fisher / Bethany Honey vs Amanda Gooch / Sherri Henderson4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Pounders / Monica Moon vs Sandra Hollis / Donna Murray4-6, 2-6
2024-10-17vs Howton- FALL24Lost 13
W#1 DoublesJill Archer / Stacey Strickland vs Carol Baron / Dawn Sparks6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLaura Kroeger vs Debbie Haythorn4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRita Fisher / Bethany Honey vs Kristin Merriss / Valerie Oakley1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Willis / Melissa Hargett vs Jane Chasan / Sheary McLendon0-6, 2-6
2024-10-10vs Wingo 40+ 3.0 FALLLost 13
W#1 DoublesStacey Strickland / Rita Fisher vs Donna Murray / Kristy Wigginton6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMelissa Aycock vs Kellie Gandy4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Willis / Monica Moon vs Amy Garrett / Sherri Henderson0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Butler / Melissa Hargett vs Stephonie McCrory / Kim Tompkins4-6, 1-6
2024-10-06vs Howton- FALL24Lost 04
L#1 DoublesBethany Honey / Rita Fisher vs Kristin Merriss / Elizabeth Graves2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Aycock vs April Howton2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Moon / Paula Pounders vs Sheary McLendon / Jane Chasan2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVickie Hill / Jill Archer vs Kim Azeem / Dawn Sparks0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bethany Honey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.73
Stacey Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Paula Pounders
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.50
Monica Moon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.47
Melissa Aycock
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.35
Laura Kroeger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.15
Melissa Hargett
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.05
Rita Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
1.92
Laura Butler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Vickie Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Moon + Paula Pounders134 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Aycock + Paula Pounders224 matchesnot enough data
Rita Fisher + Bethany Honey033 matchesnot enough data
Rita Fisher + Melissa Hargett033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bethany Honey
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Strickland
10W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Paula Pounders
21W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Monica Moon
17W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Melissa Aycock
27W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%58%42%
2.47
Laura Kroeger
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.35
Melissa Hargett
11W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.15
Rita Fisher
8W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Laura Butler
1W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Vickie Hill
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.