Teams

SReynolds (Queens)

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-25vs ERoach/SJPragasam (Hornets Nest)Split 22
W#1 DoublesMargaret Schrimsher / Lizzy Ervin vs SJ Pragasam / Kanika Raja6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMegan Hunter vs Gabriela Cooper-Vespa4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesChristina Thigpen vs Cynthia Hoover3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMarta Tataje / Elizabeth Strack vs Erin Roach / Julie Hollifield4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-17vs SHicks/WSolomon (Carmel)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Strack / Mollie James vs Amie Rucker / Suzannah Hicks3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKeri Cantrell / Lauren Woodward vs Amy Elaasar / Whitney Smith0-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesMonica Erb vs Amanda Jarman6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarianne Keaton / Sharon Roberts vs Lindy Gignac / Amanda Nichols0-6, 3-6
2025-04-03vs NHaskins (Mason Wallace)Won 30
W#1 SinglesMegan Hunter vs Colleen Hickman6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLizzy Ervin / Mollie James vs Christine Leavitt / Melissa Weaver6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesChristina Thigpen vs Rachel Sawyer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-27vs KJohnstone (PPRSC)Won 32
W#1 DoublesMonica Erb / Alexis Kaiser vs Holly McClure / Kathleen Johnstone6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMegan Hunter vs Alyssa Salette6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarianne Keaton / Elizabeth Strack vs Dana Zimmer / Annaliese Anderson2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesChristina Thigpen vs Heather Rhyne6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Woodward / Keri Cantrell vs Lindsey Kerr / Ofelia Claxton6-0, 6-2
2025-03-20vs MMetzl/MLGarrison (Sardis)Won 31
W#1 DoublesLizzy Ervin / Margaret Schrimsher vs Renee Broud / Lynne Schachte6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMegan Hunter vs Kathryn Martin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChristina Thigpen vs Caroline Cox6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSharon Roberts / Elizabeth Strack vs Amie Caudle / Mary Laird Garrison3-6, 3-6
2025-03-13vs ATaylor (Mason Wallace)Split 22
L#1 DoublesLizzy Ervin / Megan Hunter vs Austin Taylor / Isabella Waung3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMonica Erb vs Morgan Scruggs6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStefanie Reynolds / Marianne Keaton vs Ryan Traudt / Madeline Jurch4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Woodward / Keri Cantrell vs Sheila Walsh / Caroline Donahue6-2, 6-3
2025-03-06vs TStamey/Black (Matthews)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesStefanie Reynolds / Monica Erb vs Tracy Stamey / Allison Turner2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristina Thigpen vs Dana Holloman6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Schrimsher / Lynn Hughes vs Paula Donoghue / Megan Pruski3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Monica Erb
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 11% · published 4.5
3.98
Alexis Kaiser
published 4
3.94
Lauren Woodward
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Lizzy Ervin
published
3.75
Mollie James
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Marta Tataje
published
3.61
Marianne Keaton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.56
Margaret Schrimsher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Lynn Hughes
published
3.48
Megan Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.42
Stefanie Reynolds
published
3.40
Elizabeth Strack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.25
Christina Thigpen
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Strack + Monica Erb044 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Strack + Margaret Schrimsher404 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Schrimsher + Mollie James303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Monica Erb
97W–77L career · 8 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4
Alexis Kaiser
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Lauren Woodward
139W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Lizzy Ervin
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Mollie James
86W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Marta Tataje
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Marianne Keaton
56W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
4
Margaret Schrimsher
98W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Lynn Hughes
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Megan Hunter
64W–77L career · 12 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Stefanie Reynolds
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.42
4
Elizabeth Strack
51W–101L career · 4 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Christina Thigpen
40W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.