Teams

RCC GREEN

2024 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME

12 players · average NTRP 2.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-11vs BCC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Bruny / Lauren Richards vs Alana Malone / Paige Walker1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLesley Johs / Tracy Zahner vs Emma Anselmi / Catherine Ruelas0-6, 3-6
2024-06-04vs LAC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Stuckemeyer / Erika Oakes vs Amy Grolnick / Caitlin McTague6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAllyson Shimer / Lesley Johs vs Susan Dalgleish / Stacy Welding6-3, 6-3
2024-05-28vs NJ GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Richards / Jessica Bruny vs Heather Roberts / Leidy Boyce6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-05-21vs BCC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesJessica Bruny / Lauren Richards vs Paige Walker / Catherine Ruelas4-6, 2-6
2024-05-14vs LAC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesErika Oakes / Karen Stuckemeyer vs Amy Grolnick / Caitlin McTague1-6, 3-6
2024-05-07vs NJ GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesErika Oakes / Lauren Richards vs Svitlana Pylypenko / Lindsay Thompson7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLesley Johs / Sandra Zoratti vs Danielle Rupp / Mindy Armbruster6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Lauren Richards
published
2.78
Sara Wang
published
2.51
Lesley Johs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Jessica Bruny
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Allyson Shimer
published 3
2.34
Mandy Sutton
published
Christina Sjolin
published 2.5
2.22
Heather Huelsman
published
2.19
Erika Oakes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.09
Karen Stuckemeyer
published
1.82
Tracy Zahner
published
Sandra Zoratti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Bruny + Lesley Johs15655% games+5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Richards
25W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Sara Wang
24W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Lesley Johs
37W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Jessica Bruny
33W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.44
3
Allyson Shimer
10W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.41
Mandy Sutton
25W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Christina Sjolin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Heather Huelsman
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Erika Oakes
21W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
Karen Stuckemeyer
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Tracy Zahner
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Sandra Zoratti
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.