Teams

Huntington

2025 Anne Arundel Doubles Winter Women · Anne Arundel Doubles Winter 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-27vs Ravekes/YannoneLost 01
L#2 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Jennifer Timian vs Cindee Smith / Karen Yannone2-6, 1-6
2025-03-03vs Coady/WalshLost 01
L#1 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Joan Williams vs Jennifer Coady / Elizabeth Jacobson0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-19vs Ravekes/YannoneLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Perotti / Rosalie Hooper vs Karen Yannone / Cindee Smith6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-04vs AhmedWon 10
W#3 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Joan Williams vs Annette James / Lenora Spencer6-1, 6-0
2025-01-15vs AhmedWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoan Williams / Rosalie Hooper vs Denese Cavanaugh / Mary Corbiere6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Doubles Winter 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Sue King
published
3.20
Kristen Burke
published
3.18
Rosalie Hooper
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Andrea Perotti
published 3.5
3.17
Marina Anglim
published
3.14
Jill Huntington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.09
Kim Reed
published
2.88
Lynn Hoffman
published
2.80
Jennifer Timian
published
2.64
Yulin Henry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yulin Henry + Jill Huntington3353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sue King
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kristen Burke
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Rosalie Hooper
188W–181L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Andrea Perotti
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Marina Anglim
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Jill Huntington
206W–137L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
Kim Reed
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lynn Hoffman
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Jennifer Timian
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Yulin Henry
182W–192L career · 10 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.