Teams

Salisbury Moorhead

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Wed

18 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-11-01vs Avalon KallmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Mandy Tornabene vs Faith Kallman / Ellen Armstrong6-4, 6-1
2021-10-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Mandy Tornabene vs Mary Scott / Deirdre Vaughan3-6, 4-6
2021-10-07vs Westwood NilsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Mandy Tornabene vs Julie Farney / Holley Nilson6-4, 7-6
2021-09-15vs Bon Air MetzWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Mandy Tornabene vs Nancy Metz / Martha Rhodes3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Drew Lineberger
published 4.5
3.40
Mandy Tornabene
published
3.30
Stacey Gray
published
3.27
Laura Booberg
published
Gaurav Shrestha
published 3.5
3.06
Jessica Steinour
published
3.05
Cheryl Cacciotti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Kimberly Means
published
2.84
Vincent Totaro
published
2.73
Clay Creamer
published 3
2.72
Cathy Keith
published 3
2.53
Beth Dwyer
published 3
2.42
Paul Piotrowski
published
Kendra Wiggins
published
Lauren Cecil
published
Scott Broaddus
published
Steve Shaffer
published
Susan Gregory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Piotrowski + Vincent Totaro134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Drew Lineberger
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mandy Tornabene
15W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
Stacey Gray
21W–9L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Laura Booberg
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Gaurav Shrestha
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jessica Steinour
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Cheryl Cacciotti
67W–85L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%35%65%
3.05
Kimberly Means
9W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
2.86
Vincent Totaro
12W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Clay Creamer
3W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Cathy Keith
8W–24L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Beth Dwyer
3W–11L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
2.53
Paul Piotrowski
6W–14L career · no lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
2.42
Kendra Wiggins
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lauren Cecil
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Broaddus
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Shaffer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Gregory
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.