Teams

ALawler/BGibson (WSRC)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Wed PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-16vs JButurff (Life Time)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAlberto Botero / Ken Klug vs Josh Mikels / Nate Siens3-6, 3-6
2022-04-27vs YHan (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTodd Creange / Oluseun Alli vs Tiecheng Liu / Hongqing Vincent Wang7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-13vs TSandy (CITC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesTodd Creange / Josh Miller vs Tim Cheek / Hunter Blankenship2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKen Klug / DJ Kulkarni vs Scott MacIntosh / Matthew Turner6-3, 6-3
2022-04-06vs TFailla/JDichak (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKen Klug / Todd Creange vs Phillip Davidson / Daniel Kolepp2-6, 6-7
2022-04-05vs KFox (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKen Klug / Todd Creange vs Robert Shore / Benjamin Bergeson3-6, 5-7
2022-03-30vs MWallace (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAaron Bouronich / Todd Creange vs Ken DeHart / John Tynan6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBruce Gibson / Ken Klug vs Mike Wallace / Gale Haruta2-6, 3-6
2022-03-09vs KConners (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTodd Creange / Josh Miller vs Kevin Conners / CJ ONeill5-7, 4-6
2022-03-02vs DDeMaine (Jeff Adams)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAaron Bouronich / Todd Creange vs Joe Sexton / Kshitiz Gupta6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKen Klug / Bruce Gibson vs Cameron Lober / Daniel Digby1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Oluseun Alli
published
3.29
Andrew Lawler
published 3.5
3.17
Alberto Botero
published 3.5
3.12
Todd Creange
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.07
Vladislav Valtsis
published
2.98
Ken Klug
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Bruce Gibson
published 3
2.69
Eloy ROY
published 3
Aaron Bouronich
published
DJ Kulkarni
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Klug + Todd Creange1539% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Lawler + Todd Creange2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Oluseun Alli
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Andrew Lawler
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Alberto Botero
20W–23L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Todd Creange
53W–96L career · 7 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Vladislav Valtsis
16W–25L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Ken Klug
102W–84L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Bruce Gibson
45W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Eloy ROY
19W–23L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
Aaron Bouronich
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
DJ Kulkarni
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.