Teams

FSSC Lehner

2023 OH OV FALL A18&O · Fall 4.5 Men Dayton

17 players · average NTRP 4.12 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-10vs QRRC ButteryWon 20
W#1 SinglesMax Tsao vs Luke Hoban6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesEmanuel Papp vs Paul Hodge6-3, 6-2
2022-10-16vs QRRC ButterySplit 22
W#1 DoublesRobert Lehner / Max Tsao vs Donald Nguyen / Andrew Schulz7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTodd Oaks vs Luke Hoban1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesConrad Klank / Luis Carlos Estrada Ruiz vs Chase Buttery / Paul Hodge6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesStephen Coates / Chris Compton vs GOBINATH BALASUBRAMANIAN / Gopal Bhat6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-10-15vs QRRC HeinzLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarlos Estrada-Sanchez / Robert Lehner vs Michael Hall / Alexander Boardman3-6, 0-6
2022-10-01vs QRRC HeinzSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWill Owen / Robert Lehner vs David Peyton / Todd Rich6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJorge Crespo / Yakov Diskin vs Darrin Heinz / Scott Shope3-6, 4-6
2022-09-25vs QRRC HeinzLost 01
L#1 DoublesJorge Crespo / Yakov Diskin vs Alexander Boardman / David Peyton2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Fall 4.5 Men Dayton
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FSSC Lehner3371123179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Luis Carlos Estrada Ruiz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Conrad Klank
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Enrico Ferri
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4.5
3.86
Emanuel Papp
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.83
Chris Compton
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 4
3.79
Adam Beiersdorfer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.77
Stephen Coates
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Jorge Crespo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Brian Thomeczek
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.47
Cam Woliver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Cary Browne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Deane Grandfield
published
Max Tsao
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Lair
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Lehner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Todd Oaks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Yakov Diskin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Conrad Klank + Yakov Diskin3259% games+7.2% vs expected
Yakov Diskin + Robert Lehner7653% games+4.9% vs expected
Enrico Ferri + Adam Beiersdorfer2647% games+4.5% vs expected
Brian Thomeczek + Enrico Ferri10752% games+3.7% vs expected
Brian Thomeczek + Adam Beiersdorfer5350% games−2.7% vs expected
Conrad Klank + Luis Carlos Estrada Ruiz16556% games−4.9% vs expected
Cary Browne + Robert Lair0735% games−5.1% vs expected
Cam Woliver + Robert Lair6556% games−7.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Carlos Estrada Ruiz
29W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Conrad Klank
40W–52L career · 1 line in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Enrico Ferri
143W–91L career · 6 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.10
4
Emanuel Papp
41W–50L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Chris Compton
100W–59L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Adam Beiersdorfer
137W–63L career · 14 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
Stephen Coates
72W–68L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Jorge Crespo
53W–92L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Brian Thomeczek
68W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Cam Woliver
23W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
4
Cary Browne
17W–63L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.41
Deane Grandfield
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Max Tsao
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Lair
58W–39L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Lehner
22W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Todd Oaks
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Yakov Diskin
33W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.