Teams

Da.Rusnak18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-09vs Ki.Meeker18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Huffstetler / Nadia Dahir vs Sarah Herring / Kimberlie Meeker0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Lindeman / Nadeen Baddar vs Cameron Jones / Holly Gyovai3-6, 1-6
2025-09-25vs Am.Cantando18CLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Lindeman / Lori Stevens vs Karen Bornhofen / Amy Cantando3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLeigh Watson / Nadeen Baddar vs Anne Enberg / Angela McGee1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Rusnak / Nadia Dahir vs Ellen Nespeca / Nicole Masters6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-11vs Me.Dougher18C5.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesNadia Dahir / Natalie Norris vs Samantha Brody Moses / Lindsey Parker6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAshley Lindeman / Nadeen Baddar vs Melissa Dougher / Christina Dickson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Stevens / Brittany Shumaker vs Monty Goodrich / Amy Willard4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-04vs Ka.Steadman18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Shuey / Nadia Dahir vs Taryn Backus / Angela Myers1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Maginnis / Ashley Lindeman vs Michelle Eisenberg / Shannon Clarkson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-28vs Co.Hicks18C5.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Huffstetler / Nadia Dahir vs Bailey Anthony / Courtney Hicks6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNadeen Baddar / Natalie Norris vs Emlyn Henley / Mary Margaret Ross3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Rusnak / Claire Baldwin vs Tucker Andrews / Kaitlyn Floyd6-0, 6-1
2025-08-14vs Ca.Aden18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrittany Shumaker / Lori Stevens vs Lindsey Taylor / Haley Davies2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDawn Rusnak / Nadeen Baddar vs Paige Coltrera / Heidi Suke1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Julie Shuey
published
2.79
Claire Baldwin
published 3
2.64
Ashley Lindeman
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Natalie Norris
published
2.58
Nadia Dahir
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Kelly Huffstetler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Dawn Rusnak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Leigh Watson
published
2.38
Brittany Shumaker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.32
Leigh Baxter
published
2.26
Diane Maginnis
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.24
Megan Mitchell
published
2.20
Nadeen Baddar
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Lindeman + Brittany Shumaker5454% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Rusnak + Nadia Dahir4355% gamesnot enough data
Diane Maginnis + Nadia Dahir3340% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Lindeman + Natalie Norris0532% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Rusnak + Nadeen Baddar123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Shuey + Ashley Lindeman123 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Shumaker + Nadia Dahir303 matchesnot enough data
Diane Maginnis + Megan Mitchell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Shuey
11W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Claire Baldwin
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Ashley Lindeman
45W–71L career · 9 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Natalie Norris
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Nadia Dahir
38W–59L career · 12 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Kelly Huffstetler
84W–118L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Dawn Rusnak
134W–124L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Leigh Watson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Brittany Shumaker
46W–80L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Leigh Baxter
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
2.5
Diane Maginnis
20W–47L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.26
Megan Mitchell
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Nadeen Baddar
20W–44L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.