Teams

RDuggins40

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-09vs FMabungaWon 20
W#1 SinglesMatt Shait vs Francis Mabunga6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKen Trefzger / McNair Bell vs Dennis Murphy / Mac Mcintyre6-0, 6-4
2022-05-02vs AMcKay/CCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesMcNair Bell / Robert Duggins vs Andrew McKay / Wesley Fricks5-7, 3-6
2022-04-27vs DHuffman/NHCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatt Shait / Kevin Kilroy vs John Agnew / Dane Huffman6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJohn Parham vs Jason Steele5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Marriott / Mike Kaelin vs Stewart Marlowe / John Perry6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesRoy Kelly / Matt Shait vs Stephen Shaw / Josh Wein6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMike Kaelin vs Robert Brown6-0, 6-2
2022-04-04vs JStieglerWon 10
W#3 DoublesMcNair Bell / John Parham vs Ben Desonglo / Jason Prabel7-6, 7-5
2022-03-28vs WMooneyLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatt Shait / Stephen Jorge vs Matt Phillips / Duane Hall6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJohn Parham vs Joe Robinson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMike Kaelin / Robert Duggins vs David Hill / Howard Critcher7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-21vs IMKocurekSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMatt Shait vs Scott Hoffman6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKen Trefzger / McNair Bell vs Christopher Carrigan / Michael Campbell3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Matt Shait
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.57
Roy Kelly
published
3.44
Mike Kaelin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
John Parham
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
McNair Bell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Robert Marriott
published
3.21
Ronnie Duncan
published
3.15
Ken Trefzger
published
Jason Hagens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

McNair Bell + John Parham4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Matt Shait
73W–48L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Roy Kelly
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Mike Kaelin
104W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.44
John Parham
57W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
McNair Bell
34W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Robert Marriott
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Ronnie Duncan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Ken Trefzger
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Jason Hagens
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.