Teams

ETC-Team2-Box

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-15vs CAC/SL-Moonballers-TulgaWon 21
W#1 DoublesVenkat Mahalingam / Thomas Resing vs Naveen Gande / Shane Nelson6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMiroslav Spassov vs Tuvshin Tulga1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAndrea Fabrizi / Oveys Hedayati vs Colin Bohn / Hong Ma6-2, 6-3
2026-05-08vs WSC-ACE-ZhuLost 12
W#1 DoublesHarish Mallidi / Michalis Chrysanthou vs Eddie Tseng / Zhaoxuan Zhu6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Fabrizi vs Mitch Zhu0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesOmid Fatemieh / Rush Velcsov vs Shawn Zhang / Zi Lin0-6, 3-6
2026-04-24vs NWW-HBSQ-RedaLost 03
L#1 DoublesHarish Mallidi / Oveys Hedayati vs Kumar Bhat / Kevin Mcdonald3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesArmin Alaghi vs Ian Dangla3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMiroslav Spassov / Venkat Mahalingam vs Forrest Reda / Jorge Calugas Ii2-6, 1-6
2026-04-18vs TUK-Dub City-MesarosWon 21
L#1 DoublesHarish Mallidi / Armin Alaghi vs Paulo Mesaros / Jerry Osborn1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMiroslav Spassov vs Hrach Gabrielyan6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesOveys Hedayati / Andrea Fabrizi vs Carlos Cortes / Donald Ngwe6-2, 6-2
2026-04-17vs NWW-MI-ChangWon 21
L#1 DoublesThomas Natsis / Thomas Resing vs Lee Slaughter / Bryn Peterson3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSwamy Shivaganga Nagaraju vs Paul Sherland6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesOmid Fatemieh / Oveys Hedayati vs Alex Tanielian / Kyusong Lee6-1, 6-2
2026-04-11vs NWW-MI-ChangLost 03
L#1 DoublesArmin Alaghi / Venkat Mahalingam vs Oliver Chang / Jeffrey Wenzel1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHarish Mallidi vs Lee Slaughter1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRush Velcsov / Thomas Resing vs Chad Rowe / Shaz Qadeer2-6, 1-6
2026-04-03vs MC-M 2.5-PurgananWon 21
L#1 DoublesMiroslav Spassov / Harish Mallidi vs Senthil Kumar Muthu / Prateek Shankar5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Fabrizi vs Suresh Siricilla6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVenkat Mahalingam / Armin Alaghi vs Aditya Choudhary / Wayne Zhao7-6, 6-4
2026-03-28vs CAC/SL-Moonballers-TulgaWon 30
W#1 DoublesMiroslav Spassov / Rush Velcsov vs Tuvshin Tulga / Hong Ma6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHarish Mallidi vs Juefei Yan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichalis Chrysanthou / Thomas Natsis vs Nikita Amelin / Sean Diven7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Michalis Chrysanthou
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
Oveys Hedayati
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.35
Thomas Natsis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.35
Swamy Shivaganga Nagaraju
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.34
Miroslav Spassov
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.27
Rush Velcsov
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Armin Alaghi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.21
Harish Mallidi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.20
Omid Fatemieh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Andrea Fabrizi
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.06
Venkat Mahalingam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.94
Thomas Resing
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Robert Box
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miroslav Spassov + Rush Velcsov4354% games+5.4% vs expected
Thomas Resing + Venkat Mahalingam224 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Natsis + Michalis Chrysanthou303 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Fabrizi + Oveys Hedayati303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michalis Chrysanthou
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.54
2.5
Oveys Hedayati
17W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Thomas Natsis
17W–14L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Swamy Shivaganga Nagaraju
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Miroslav Spassov
24W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Rush Velcsov
34W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Armin Alaghi
4W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Harish Mallidi
3W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Omid Fatemieh
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Andrea Fabrizi
15W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Venkat Mahalingam
3W–10L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Thomas Resing
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Robert Box
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.