Teams

Reilly - Wichita Country Club, Wichita

2021 KS 18 & Over Adult Outdoor League · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-17vs Seitz - Kossover, TopekaLost 02
L#1 DoublesWhitney Ward / Caroline Unger vs Debra Schwarz / Catherine Craig2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Gaddis / Alyssa Moeller vs Karen Speaks / Ali Wilson1-6, 1-6
2021-07-17vs Seitz - Kossover, TopekaLost 03
L#1 DoublesWhitney Ward / Caroline Unger vs Karen Speaks / Ali Wilson2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGina Cole vs Catherine Craig6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Darrah / Tini Ruhfus vs Debra Schwarz / Jennifer Lane6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-30vs Ball/Jargo - Crestview, WichitaLost 23
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Reilly / Emie Stehley vs Cathie Hayes / Maggie Seitz6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGina Cole vs Laurel Bogner0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Darrah / Caroline Unger vs Shelly Hardman / Nina Davis5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAllyson Teal vs Reycee Bartlett6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTini Ruhfus / Mary Oliver vs Lea Ann Mcilvain / Penny Wright7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-15vs KS/Pushyk/Hull/Jones/18&Over3.5WLost 14
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Reilly / Emie Stehley vs Pamela McCullough / Brenda Munds6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Sebits vs Jordan Hull1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Gentile / Caroline Unger vs Julie Le / DeAnn White3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesGina Cole vs Lara Salgado4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJesica Rothwell / Tini Ruhfus vs Kathleen Bagwell / Cathy Suellentrop1-6, 3-6
2021-06-09vs Ball/Jargo - Crestview, WichitaLost 14
W#1 DoublesCourtney Darrah / Emie Stehley vs Nina Davis / Cathie Hayes6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Sebits vs Olivia Cartwright2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMary Oliver / Julie Gentile vs Camille Nyberg / Diane Ball0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAllyson Teal vs Lisa Cole1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTini Ruhfus / Terri Cusick vs Shelly Hardman / Linda Criser0-6, 4-6
2021-06-03vs KS/Pushyk/Hull/Jones/18&Over3.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Reilly / Emie Stehley vs Linda Anderson / GEORGIA AHERN3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWhitney Ward vs Brenda Munds2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Gentile / Kim Lett vs DeAnn White / Cindy Hull1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KS/Pushyk/Hull/Jones/18&Over3.5W6022819182
2Ball/Jargo - Crestview, Wichita24141636268
3Reilly - Wichita Country Club, Wichita0682248305

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Jesica Rothwell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.45
Mindi Chance
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Jaclyn Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Gina Cole
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.31
Allyson Teal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.13
Jennifer Sebits
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.93
Whitney Ward
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.86
Alyssa Moeller
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.81
Courtney Darrah
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Dara Geoffroy
published 3
2.72
Julie Gentile
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kim Lett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Cusick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tini Ruhfus
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyssa Moeller + Julie Gentile3448% games+9.0% vs expected
Allyson Teal + Jesica Rothwell16658% games+4.6% vs expected
Jaclyn Reilly + Jesica Rothwell6556% games+3.3% vs expected
Jaclyn Reilly + Allyson Teal13759% games+1.4% vs expected
Allyson Teal + Jennifer Sebits1541% games+0.3% vs expected
Allyson Teal + Gina Cole7657% games−0.6% vs expected
Dara Geoffroy + Whitney Ward2342% games−2.2% vs expected
Whitney Ward + Jaclyn Reilly3741% games−7.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesica Rothwell
61W–43L career · 5 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
Mindi Chance
44W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Jaclyn Reilly
72W–53L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Gina Cole
52W–43L career · 10 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Allyson Teal
65W–52L career · 9 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Jennifer Sebits
52W–46L career · 7 lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13
Whitney Ward
16W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Alyssa Moeller
24W–28L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Courtney Darrah
31W–39L career · 10 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Dara Geoffroy
16W–10L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Julie Gentile
32W–53L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
Kim Lett
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Terri Cusick
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tini Ruhfus
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.