Teams

LEBTC BLUE

2024 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-18vs BM REDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPatty Carstens / Sandi Plude vs Hannah Miller / Melissa Miller2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Burns / Adele Rhinehart vs Noel Litchkowski / Beth Cooper6-0, 6-2
2024-06-11vs LEBTC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdele Rhinehart / Cary Peskin vs Suzanne Kwilman / Janet Swanson7-5, 6-3
2024-05-28vs CCC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesSandi Plude / Adele Rhinehart vs Lori Manzer / Nicole Bolick7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-05-21vs SS-H TEALWon 20
W#2 DoublesCary Peskin / Sandi Plude vs Cheryl Sanders / Sandy Stocker6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAdele Rhinehart / Janet Burns vs Carol Lugo / Heidi David6-3, 7-6
2024-05-14vs KC-RH WHITELost 01
L#2 DoublesSandi Plude / Alice Soderman vs Lori Thorp / Kristen Weeks6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-05-07vs HRCA-N REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandi Plude / Alice Soderman vs Cinda Nab / Joyce Naylon7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jana Warwick
published
3.23
Adele Rhinehart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Cary Peskin
published 3.5
3.17
Patty Carstens
published
3.12
Julie Heck
published
3.06
Sandi Plude
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.89
Alice Soderman
published 3
2.75
Janet Burns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cary Peskin + Alice Soderman1547% games+1.0% vs expected
Sandi Plude + Alice Soderman10456% games+0.3% vs expected
Sandi Plude + Jana Warwick4159% gamesnot enough data
Sandi Plude + Cary Peskin224 matchesnot enough data
Janet Burns + Cary Peskin224 matchesnot enough data
Sandi Plude + Janet Burns033 matchesnot enough data
Sandi Plude + Adele Rhinehart123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jana Warwick
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Adele Rhinehart
96W–104L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cary Peskin
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Patty Carstens
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Julie Heck
16W–19L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Sandi Plude
105W–84L career · 5 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Alice Soderman
63W–65L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
Janet Burns
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.