Teams

MMacdonald-HS

2025 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26vs JRanheim-ENOWon 10
W#2 SinglesTynita Edwards vs Jamie Scaglione6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-19vs ETurner-HRLost 12
L#1 SinglesShira Katsir vs Rhiannon Ludington0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesTynita Edwards vs Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs Ellie Turner4-6, 6-7
2025-06-12vs TCrowley-CHTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesAltagracia Evert vs Tracy Crowley2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs Dina Golden2-6, 2-6
2025-06-06vs TPrinstein-HRLost 01
L#2 SinglesShira Katsir vs Michelle Koeneke0-6, 0-6
2025-06-05vs GLoFrese-ENOLost 01
L#1 SinglesShira Katsir vs Kellianne White1-6, 2-6
2025-05-22vs KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 01
L#2 SinglesAltagracia Evert vs Lauren Powell5-7, 2-6
2025-05-15vs SBartle-ENOWon 10
W#1 SinglesTynita Edwards vs Shannon Bartle6-1, 6-0
2025-05-08vs LKulp-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesAltagracia Evert vs Lori Salzmann7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs Laurie Birdsong6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Mary Macdonald
published
2.82
Altagracia Evert
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.73
Shira Katsir
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.72
Carin von Kahr
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.64
Tynita Edwards
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.56
Kristen Bradfield
published
2.25
Linda Naden
published
Jennifer Draughon
published
Peggi Hunter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Altagracia Evert + Tynita Edwards5163% gamesnot enough data
Altagracia Evert + Mary Macdonald123 matchesnot enough data
Altagracia Evert + Shira Katsir123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Macdonald
25W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Altagracia Evert
74W–69L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Shira Katsir
32W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Carin von Kahr
43W–63L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Tynita Edwards
100W–92L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
Kristen Bradfield
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Linda Naden
4W–19L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.25
Jennifer Draughon
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggi Hunter
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.