Teams

KY/LEX/Ernst 3.5

2026 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER LEXINGTON · 3.5 MIXED

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-21vs KY/LEX/Coy/RossLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Brown / Sarah Knight vs David Ferretti / Sarah Stykes4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Simonsen / Scot Simonsen vs Joe Ross / Ann Boone2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSarah Hancock / Dave Cunningham vs Jeannie Guskey / Gerald Slone4-6, 3-6
2026-07-18vs KY/LEX/Coy/RossWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Thompson / Aniseto Hernandez vs Benny Evans / Karen Diggs7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCraig Overstreet / Marvetta Overstreet vs Sarah Stykes / Joe Ross1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Knight / Jamie Corbett vs Emily Pernice / Anthony Pernice1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-16vs KY/LEX/Coy/RossLost 03
L#1 DoublesAniseto Hernandez / Maria del Mar Landron vs Ann Boone / Derrick Johnson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Simonsen / Scot Simonsen vs Gerald Slone / Julia Hutchens7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Hancock / Jamie Corbett vs Janine Coy / Ravi Raithatha1-6, 3-6
2026-07-12vs KY/LEX/Coy/RossWon 21
L#1 DoublesDave Cunningham / Amy Cunningham vs Emily Diehl / Benny Evans2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAniseto Hernandez / Heather Thompson vs Justin Ross / Amy Worthington Johnson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarvetta Overstreet / Patrick Hancock vs Jeannie Guskey / Anthony Pernice7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-23vs KY/LEX/Coy/RossLost 12
L#1 DoublesDave Cunningham / Amy Cunningham vs Ann Boone / David Ferretti1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Hancock / Heather Thompson vs Emily Pernice / Derrick Johnson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Brown / Maria del Mar Landron vs Amy Worthington Johnson / David Fields7-6, 6-1
2026-06-17vs KY/LEX/Coy/RossLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Thompson / Scot Simonsen vs Janine Coy / Benny Evans2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaria del Mar Landron / Jamie Corbett vs Emily Diehl / Ravi Raithatha5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarvetta Overstreet / Craig Overstreet vs Casey Hutchens / Julia Hutchens5-7, 1-6
2026-06-13vs KY/LEX/Coy/RossLost 12
W#1 DoublesAniseto Hernandez / Allison George vs Sarah Stykes / Justin Ross2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCraig Overstreet / Marvetta Overstreet vs Janine Coy / Gerald Slone4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMeghan Simonsen / Scot Simonsen vs Casey Hutchens / Julia Hutchens2-6, 3-6
2026-06-02vs KY/LEX/Coy/RossLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Back / Guston Thomas vs Ann Boone / Derrick Johnson2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Thompson / Jamie Corbett vs David Ferretti / Emily Diehl7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatrick Hancock / Sarah Hancock vs David Fields / Karen Diggs2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/Coy/Ross6218615176
2KY/LEX/Ernst 3.52661840275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Sarah Knight
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Patrick Hancock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Maria del Mar Landron
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Aniseto Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Meghan Simonsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Guston Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Craig Overstreet
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Carlyn Moore
published 3.5
3.13
Scot Simonsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Sarah Back
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Marvetta Overstreet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Jamie Corbett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Dave Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marvetta Overstreet + Craig Overstreet044 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Simonsen + Scot Simonsen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Knight
40W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Patrick Hancock
42W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
Maria del Mar Landron
18W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Aniseto Hernandez
15W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Meghan Simonsen
35W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Guston Thomas
58W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Craig Overstreet
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Carlyn Moore
28W–58L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Scot Simonsen
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
Sarah Back
27W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Marvetta Overstreet
14W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Jamie Corbett
18W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Dave Cunningham
51W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.