Teams

Manor 4.0

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Winter Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-29vs Koele/CallahanLost 02
L#2 DoublesKelley Donellan / Marijane Forde vs Mary Jo Roberton / Christine Pagendarm1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Hockey / Lisa Johnson vs Laura Haney / Julie Swartz4-6, 3-6
2024-03-18vs MagginLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Hjelle / Shannon Hockey vs Allison Fulton / Christine Koy7-6, 2-5
2024-03-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRose Nowak / Shannon Hockey vs Maria Elena Greene / Alixandria Lapp3-6, 5-4
2024-02-20vs Love All 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesShannon Hockey / Sherifa Fahmy vs Carrie Wofford / Tina Halley3-6, 5-7
2024-02-16vs Block/CopelandWon 10
W#3 DoublesKelley Donellan / Marijane Forde vs Sherry Dunda / Sharon Cassidy7-5, 2-6
2024-02-05vs BCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesPamela Hjelle / Shannon Hockey vs Monica Brenneman / Vicki Herson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-01-12vs Love BugsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarijane Forde / Pamela Hjelle vs Melanie Caudron / Lori Clogg6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Sherri Dixon
published
3.73
Pamela Hjelle
published
3.64
3.55
Cammie Condell
published 3.5
3.48
Lisa Hanagan
published
3.48
Kelley Donellan
published
3.44
Melisssa Hacopian
published
3.43
Shannon Hockey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Marijane Forde
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Amy Burgoyne
published 3.5
3.20
Maureen Smith
published
Sarah Albus
published
Sherifa Fahmy
published
Susan Quirk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Burgoyne + Cammie Condell224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Quirk + Lisa Hanagan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherri Dixon
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Pamela Hjelle
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Cathy Ventrell-Monsees
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Cammie Condell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
Lisa Hanagan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
Kelley Donellan
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.48
Melisssa Hacopian
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Shannon Hockey
34W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Marijane Forde
36W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Amy Burgoyne
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Maureen Smith
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Sarah Albus
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherifa Fahmy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Quirk
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.