Teams

SDesai/PEakin (Alexander Street Park)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-21vs JTiedeman (Palisades)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesMichael Szabo vs Luke Townsend1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesShivam Desai vs Mathias Schmidt3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJaden Wiesinger vs Kevin Green7-5, 6-2
2025-07-07vs ASchulz (Alexander Street Park)Won 30
W#1 SinglesShivam Desai vs Andrew Schulz6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesPete Eakin vs Christopher Gowin6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesJaden Wiesinger vs Guilherme Dumit7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-01vs AKiser (Mason Wallace)Won 10
W#1 SinglesSahil Vasa vs Andre Simeon6-2, 6-4
2025-06-25vs JTiedeman (Palisades)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJaden Wiesinger vs Mathias Schmidt3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKevin Siebs vs Kasper Nielsen7-6, 6-4
L#3 SinglesShivam Desai vs Kevin Green2-6, 2-6
2025-06-09vs MRobbins (Queens)Won 30
W#1 SinglesJaden Wiesinger vs Ryan Poage7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesPete Eakin vs Micah Robbins6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKevin Siebs vs Grant Carney6-3, 6-0
2025-06-02vs ASchulz (Alexander Street Park)Won 21
L#1 SinglesShivam Desai vs William Sinden4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesJaden Wiesinger vs Guilherme Dumit6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesSahil Vasa vs Christopher Gowin6-2, 7-5
2025-05-19vs AKiser (Mason Wallace)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesMichael Szabo vs Thomas Bixler3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 SinglesPete Eakin vs Alex Kiser1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesChris Butera vs Matthew Glapiak2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Pete Eakin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.23
Sahil Vasa
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
4.09
Michael Szabo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.07
Shivam Desai
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
4.05
Chris Butera
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Jaden Wiesinger
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
Kevin Siebs
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pete Eakin
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.26
Sahil Vasa
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Michael Szabo
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.09
Shivam Desai
3W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.07
4.5
Chris Butera
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Jaden Wiesinger
6W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Siebs
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.