Teams

Murfreesboro

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Murfreesboro · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-26vs Harlan/MurfreesboroLost 05
L#1 DoublesMegan McGinness / Amanda Northcutt vs Shanoa Eastland / Helen Lanning3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Beckman vs Allison Bassler1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Stacey / Kristin Winters vs Brooke Parrish / Meghan Harlan0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Beckman vs Andrea Sanders2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaryBeth Comfort / Cindy Tilton vs Mallory Maxwell / Lauren Lafevers-flatt2-6, 0-6
2026-04-25vs Harlan/MurfreesboroLost 14
L#1 DoublesMegan McGinness / Amanda Northcutt vs Meghan Harlan / Kellie Sallis0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Beckman vs Andrea Sanders6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRhodora Sanchez / Ashley Beckman vs Camille Mitchell / Helen Lanning4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKristin Winters vs Allison Bassler3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Tilton / Emmy Baker vs Lauren Lafevers-flatt / Mallory Maxwell0-6, 0-6
2026-04-11vs Harlan/MurfreesboroLost 05
L#1 DoublesGina Senne / MaryBeth Comfort vs Hannah Harrison / Shanoa Eastland0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Beckman vs Sarah White1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKristin Winters / LaTanya Sandy Johnson vs Kellie Sallis / Sarah Baird2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Beckman vs Meghan Harlan1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRhodora Sanchez / Holly Stacey vs Maggie Vandever / Haley Teeter0-6, 0-6
2026-03-15vs Harlan/MurfreesboroLost 05
L#1 DoublesAmelia Brewer / Cindy Tilton vs Brooke Parrish / Meghan Harlan0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Northcutt vs Sarah Baird1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMaryBeth Comfort / Holly Stacey vs Maggie Vandever / Hannah Harrison1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Beckman vs Katie Welch0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaTanya Sandy Johnson / Megan McGinness vs Haley Teeter / Kendra Birtsch3-6, 0-6
2026-03-14vs Harlan/MurfreesboroLost 05
L#1 DoublesKristin Winters / Gina Senne vs Hannah Harrison / Maggie Vandever0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Beckman vs Kellie Sallis2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMaryBeth Comfort / Amanda Northcutt vs Meghan Harlan / Brooke Parrish0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Beckman vs Kendra Birtsch3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMegan McGinness / Rhodora Sanchez vs Camille Mitchell / Sarah White0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Megan McGinness
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
MaryBeth Comfort
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Kristin Winters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.64
Amelia Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
LaTanya Sandy Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Sarah Beckman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.10
Ashley Beckman
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.10
Rhodora Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.01
Amanda Northcutt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
1.94
Holly Stacey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
1.63
Cindy Tilton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Julie Wishing
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan McGinness
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
MaryBeth Comfort
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Kristin Winters
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Amelia Brewer
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
LaTanya Sandy Johnson
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
2.59
Sarah Beckman
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.34
2.5
Ashley Beckman
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Rhodora Sanchez
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.10
2.5
Amanda Northcutt
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Holly Stacey
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
1.94
2.5
Cindy Tilton
0W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.63
Julie Wishing
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.