Teams

LCTA18/Beck/CTC

2022 STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Men 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Chris Wexler
published 3.5
3.29
Robert Driggers
published
Daniel Lench
published 3.5
David Schaeffer
published 3.5
Eric Sullivan
published 3.5
3.09
Campbell Hallett
published 3.5
2.91
Chris Facello
published 3
2.78
William Hutson
published
2.43
Howard Chambers
published 3
2.39
James Beck
published 3
Matthew Whipple
published
Nick Robinson
published
Tim Bond
published
Wilbert Suggs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Bond + Matthew Whipple8454% games+12.4% vs expected
Tim Bond + Robert Driggers3254% games+6.4% vs expected
William Hutson + James Beck01520% games−19.3% vs expected
Matthew Whipple + Robert Driggers213 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Whipple + Chris Wexler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Wexler
20W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Robert Driggers
44W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Daniel Lench
32W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
David Schaeffer
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Eric Sullivan
17W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Campbell Hallett
18W–20L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Chris Facello
95W–96L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
2.91
William Hutson
0W–41L career · no lines in 2022
96%4%<1%
2.78
3
Howard Chambers
9W–54L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.43
3
James Beck
1W–51L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.39
Matthew Whipple
32W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nick Robinson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Bond
23W–28L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wilbert Suggs
6W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.