Teams

Williams/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-12-08vs Epps/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrooke Williams / Victoria Sissom vs Amanda Martin / Allison King6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesElena Burns vs Lisa Gangelhoff6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJenna Sweet vs Emily Elison6-2, 6-0
2024-11-10vs Epps/KnoxvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulia Slagle / Angela Strange vs Tracy Collins / Allison King6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLauren Heinrich vs Lisa Gangelhoff5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Williams / Nazo Burgy vs Kelly Hollingsworth / Emily Elison6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesElena Burns vs Lori DeRoos6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Victoria Sissom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Angela Strange
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Nazo Burgy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Julia Slagle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Lauren Heinrich
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.60
Robyn Raley
published
3.59
Tammy Simpson
published
3.47
Elena Burns
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.17
Jennifer Lea
published
3.16
Stacy Carlson
published
Jenna Sweet
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Raley + Tammy Simpson5253% games−2.2% vs expected
Angela Strange + Julia Slagle2356% gamesnot enough data
Angela Strange + Stacy Carlson4157% gamesnot enough data
Julia Slagle + Tammy Simpson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Sissom
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.91
4
Angela Strange
23W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Nazo Burgy
90W–56L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Julia Slagle
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Lauren Heinrich
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Robyn Raley
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Tammy Simpson
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Elena Burns
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jennifer Lea
11W–25L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Stacy Carlson
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Jenna Sweet
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.