Teams

Pelican Bay Park - Beaudet

2021 Collier Adult 18 & Over Fall · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2020-12-15vs Riverstone - MalletteLost 02
L#1 DoublesMOLLY LANE / Jeanette Thevening vs Eileen Valerio / Amanda Mallette4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Kansy / Dana Sacks vs Lucy Slaboch / Kelly Stein2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2020-11-24vs Pelican Bay Park - J. BrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Beaudet / Susan Phelps vs Karen Hole / Lisa MacIas2-6, 3-6
2020-11-17vs Pelican Bay Park- DelkLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Beaudet / Dana Sacks vs Mia Delk / Gina Adiutori2-6, 3-6
2020-11-10vs Riverstone - MalletteLost 02
L#1 DoublesKrista Lombardo / Jeanette Thevening vs Dana Kinser / Carrie Stowell5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShirley Steffen / Terina Korda vs Amanda Mallette / Eileen Valerio5-7, 4-6
2020-10-27vs Fall Winners -Riverstone 2Split 11
L#1 DoublesShirley Steffen / Dana Sacks vs Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga / Bailey Lardinois6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeanette Thevening / MOLLY LANE vs Nikki Miller / Aimee Hummel6-1, 7-5
2020-10-20vs Pelican Bay Park - J. BrownSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Terina Korda vs Jennifer Brown / Gretchen Landolt2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Phelps / Christine Kriss vs Gabriela Chahwan / Tara Porte7-5, 6-3
2020-10-13vs Pelican Bay Park- DelkLost 01
L#1 DoublesShirley Steffen / Dana Sacks vs Kelly Heintzelman / Corey Stranger6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Christine Kriss
published 4
3.56
Shirley Steffen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.53
Dana Sacks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
Krista Lombardo
published
3.35
Susie Beaudet
published
3.30
Jeanette Thevening
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.76
Andrea Kansy
published 3
MOLLY LANE
published
Susan Phelps
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Terina Korda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Sacks + Shirley Steffen7453% games+4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Kriss
10W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Shirley Steffen
171W–128L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%32%68%
3.56
4
Dana Sacks
218W–149L career · 4 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
Krista Lombardo
17W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
Susie Beaudet
19W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Jeanette Thevening
144W–70L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Andrea Kansy
7W–1L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
MOLLY LANE
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Phelps
119W–117L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Terina Korda
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.