Teams

CKruse-DFC

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-02vs NLipson-UNCWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaige Giguere / Elise Nelson vs Caroline Williams / Elizabeth Klein6-2, 6-1
2025-04-25vs ADavies-CHCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaige Giguere / Laura Kirby vs Laura Horrigan / Lindsay Roofe Lavin6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDanette Pachtner / Joy Kerner vs Kate Upton / Lisa Burch6-0, 6-1
2025-04-11vs KZeph-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaige Giguere / Elise Nelson vs Anita Sobelson / Katherine Zeph6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDanette Pachtner / Christine Kruse vs Randi Emerman / Gabriella Manwell6-1, 6-1
2025-04-04vs ACook-CHCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDanette Pachtner / Ali Leblanc vs Gillian Mishalko / Anita Cook6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristine Kruse / Jodie Jepson vs Kelly Freishtat / Cheryl Briner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-28vs NLipson-UNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesCara Johnson / Christine Kruse vs Andrea O'neal / Traci Adams6-4, 6-1
2025-03-21vs ADavies-CHCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDanette Pachtner / Laura Kirby vs Joanna Hooten / Laura Horrigan6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristine Kruse / Megan Theiling vs Meredith Fitch / Karrie Tilley1-6, 1-6
2025-03-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesElise Nelson / Paige Giguere vs Anita Sobelson / Kay Sharpe6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Laura Kirby
published
2.88
Marcelle Scheyer
published
2.81
Paige Giguere
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Danette Pachtner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Megan Theiling
published
2.53
Cara Johnson
published 3
2.49
Elise Nelson
published
2.27
Christine Kruse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Ali Leblanc
published 2.5
2.20
Jaclyn Weiser
published
Jodie Jepson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danette Pachtner + Christine Kruse123 matchesnot enough data
Christine Kruse + Paige Giguere033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Kirby
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Marcelle Scheyer
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.88
3
Paige Giguere
37W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Danette Pachtner
32W–35L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Megan Theiling
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
3
Cara Johnson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Elise Nelson
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%54%46%
2.49
2.5
Christine Kruse
16W–59L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Ali Leblanc
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jaclyn Weiser
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.20
Jodie Jepson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.