Teams

Jones - Glenville Lake

Sandhills Combo 18 & Over · 5.0 18 & Over Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Highland Country Club
Sep 22 6:30 PM
The Courts at Glenville Lake
Sep 29 6:30 PM
Highland Country Club
Oct 6 6:30 PM
The Courts at Glenville Lake
2026-09-01vs Chambers - Highland Country ClubSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeredith Wermel / Theresa Jones vs Casie Burgos / Caroline Garber6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJacqui Cannon / Betty Peterson vs Susanna Haley / Kenly Dine2-6, 4-6
2026-08-18vs Chambers - Highland Country ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesTheresa Jones / Betty Peterson vs Susanna Haley / Madeline McFadyen3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMari Lesniak / Susan Miller vs Reston Chambers / Nisha Patel3-6, 3-5
W#3 DoublesJacqui Cannon / Meredith Wermel vs Courtney McDaniel / Jessica Smith6-3, 7-5
2026-08-11vs Chambers - Highland Country ClubWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Miller / Mari Lesniak vs Susanna Haley / Madeline McFadyen6-1, 5-4
W#2 DoublesTheresa Jones / Jacqui Cannon vs Kenly Dine / Victoria Stout6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBetty Peterson / Meredith Wermel vs Casie Burgos / Eimy Rojas deBeck6-3, 6-1
2026-08-04vs Chambers - Highland Country ClubLost 03
L#1 DoublesTheresa Jones / Mari Lesniak vs Susanna Haley / Nisha Patel3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Vonnegut / Susan Miller vs Madeline McFadyen / Kenly Dine0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJacqui Cannon / Meredith Wermel vs Jessica Smith / Lauren Warren2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Betty Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.52
Jacqui Cannon
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.44
Mari Lesniak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.36
Meredith Wermel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.33
Wendy Vonnegut
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Dawn Burt
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betty Peterson + Jacqui Cannon3248% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Vonnegut + Meredith Wermel134 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Vonnegut + Betty Peterson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Betty Peterson
38W–91L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%25%75%
2.60
Jacqui Cannon
13W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.52
Mari Lesniak
16W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%67%33%
2.44
Meredith Wermel
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
Wendy Vonnegut
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Dawn Burt
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.