Teams

Rally Rebels

Adult 18 & Over League · 2.5 Women's

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-23vs Laredo 2.5 LadiesLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Gil / Sara Salido vs Noemi Maldonado / Mirian Mendoza6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrenda Santos vs Debbie Martinez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnnabel Kent / Deyanira Cardenas vs Monica Mendoza / Yvonne Casso7-5, 6-4
2026-04-23vs Laredo 2.5 LadiesWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrenda Santos / Annabel Kent vs CC Cabello / Monica Mendoza6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJosefa Urteaga vs Noemi Maldonado6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKimberly Gil / Sara Salido vs Camila Nacher / Yvonne Casso6-4, 6-3
2026-04-15vs Laredo 2.5 LadiesWon 21
L#1 DoublesKimberly Gil / Deyanira Cardenas vs Debbie Martinez / CC Cabello3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJosefa Urteaga vs MacArena Gonzalez7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRoxanna Gonzalez Muzza / Brenda Santos vs Yvonne Casso / Camila Nacher6-3, 6-1
2026-04-10vs Laredo 2.5 LadiesWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Salido / Roxanna Gonzalez Muzza vs Mirian Mendoza / Monica Mendoza6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJosefa Urteaga vs MacArena Gonzalez6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeyanira Cardenas / Annabel Kent vs CC Cabello / Debbie Martinez6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women's have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
RAUL RAMOS
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Josefa Urteaga
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.38
Deyanira Cardenas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.36
Annabel Kent
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.33
Sara Salido
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.32
Brenda Santos
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.07
Kimberly Gil
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roxanna Gonzalez Muzza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

RAUL RAMOS
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
Josefa Urteaga
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
2.5
Deyanira Cardenas
2W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Annabel Kent
2W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Sara Salido
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Brenda Santos
1W–6L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Kimberly Gil
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Roxanna Gonzalez Muzza
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.