Teams

Waldman-Untouchaballs

2025 One Doubles-Winter · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-02vs Abrams/TerrienWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Murray / Leslie Waldman vs Noel Abrams / STEPHANIE TERRIEN6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-25vs Giebelhaus/Grim-VAC RacquettesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Waldman / Tiffany Washington vs Mary Guptill / Maria Robinson4-6, 5-7
2025-04-16vs Stormans-Doubles VisionLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Waldman / Diane Murray vs Jill Shanda / Nikki Dizon1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-04-07vs StruebyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristi Gonzalez / Diane Murray vs Lori Girvin / Melissa Heckman6-2, 6-1
2025-03-27vs Herrick-Net LoversWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Murray / Tiffany Washington vs Charlet Herrick / Debra Moody6-1, 6-2
2025-03-25vs Ohagan-Ravenous Alley CatsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiane Murray / Tiffany Washington vs Y-Nhi Waldo / Allison Ohagan3-6, 4-6
2025-03-19vs Wong/Massry-Slicy Spicy ChicksWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Murray / Tiffany Washington vs Dania Massry / Julie Wong5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-11vs HilliardWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Murray / Kristi Gonzalez vs Sherrill Hilliard / Wendy Clarke6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-26vs NorrisLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Waldman / Diane Murray vs Alexandrea Norris / Angela Gano1-6, 2-6
2025-02-12vs Le-Glam SlamLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Waldman / Tiffany Washington vs Wynstan Larsen / Rebecca Racine2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Diane Murray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Kristi Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Tiffany Washington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Leslie Waldman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Murray + Tiffany Washington3261% games+4.6% vs expected
Diane Murray + Kristi Gonzalez7165% games+2.0% vs expected
Kristi Gonzalez + Tiffany Washington321756% games+1.6% vs expected
Diane Murray + Leslie Waldman10553% games+1.4% vs expected
Tiffany Washington + Leslie Waldman0736% games−8.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Murray
138W–53L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Kristi Gonzalez
146W–111L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Tiffany Washington
108W–88L career · 5 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Leslie Waldman
54W–74L career · 5 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.