Teams

LATA40/Turner/RC

2022 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Men - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-24vs LATA40/Joye/LCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Turner / Lucius Jumper vs Steve Sklar / Lucas Berresford6-7, 2-6
2022-03-17vs LATA40/Henderson/LCTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Turner / Kemper Amick vs Kris Ancone / Terrance Wingfield7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-03-03vs LATA40/Schmitt/SSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Turner / Lucius Jumper vs Douglas Dunayer / Daniel Shoultz7-5, 6-2
2022-02-24vs LATA40/Dreher/SSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Turner / Larry Ellisor vs Bernie Dreher / Gregg Senn7-6, 6-2
2022-02-03vs LATA40/McCarthy/SSPLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Turner / Scott Satterfield vs Jason Branham / Nitin Jain7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kemper Amick
published
3.38
Jeff Howle
published
3.25
Michael Turner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Larry Ellisor
published
3.08
Mike Swindall
published
2.98
Scott Satterfield
published
2.95
Oderra Small
published
2.78
Jonathan Nilsson
published
Bryan Durig
published
Lucius Jumper
published
Thomas Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Ellisor + Michael Turner1447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kemper Amick
28W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jeff Howle
15W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Michael Turner
112W–108L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Larry Ellisor
30W–35L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Mike Swindall
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Scott Satterfield
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.98
Oderra Small
23W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
Jonathan Nilsson
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
Bryan Durig
20W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lucius Jumper
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Jackson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.