Teams

CP.Knudson

2023 CTRL Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Combo 55 & Over 6.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-22vs TOC.KataSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDean Ness / Stanley Brugler vs Todd Bachman / Douglas Washabaugh4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBill Baas / William Miller vs Mauricio Vargas / Paul Ahaus7-5, 6-3
2023-10-01vs TOC.KataSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStanley Brugler / Jerry Gevirtz vs Daniel McDonald / John Kata6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBill Baas / Dean Ness vs Mauricio Vargas / Mike Swanson6-3, 6-1
2023-09-24vs TOC.KataSplit 11
W#2 DoublesWilliam Miller / Bill Baas vs Steve Piucci / John Kata7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRoy Johnson / Stanley Brugler vs Paul Lebiecz / Mike Swanson6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2023-09-17vs TOC.KataLost 01
L#3 DoublesStanley Brugler / Hendrik Monsma vs David Werk / Mike Swanson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-08-27vs TOC.KataWon 10
W#3 DoublesBill Baas / Roy Johnson vs Mauricio Vargas / Steve Levine6-3, 6-1
2023-08-20vs TOC.KataWon 10
W#1 DoublesBill Baas / William Miller vs Steve Pigora / Paul Ahaus4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-08-13vs TOC.KataLost 01
L#1 DoublesStanley Brugler / Roy Johnson vs Steve Pigora / Paul Ahaus4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 55 & Over 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Adam Schoenfeld
published 3.5
3.20
Bill Baas
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.14
Jerry Gevirtz
published
3.07
Roy Johnson
published
2.94
Stanley Brugler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Ronald Radloff
published
2.73
Charles Knudson
published 3
Hendrik Monsma
published
Howard Lem
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bill Baas + Adam Schoenfeld4165% games+8.4% vs expected
Charles Knudson + Jerry Gevirtz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adam Schoenfeld
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3
Bill Baas
74W–45L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.20
Jerry Gevirtz
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.14
Roy Johnson
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Stanley Brugler
32W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Ronald Radloff
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Charles Knudson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Hendrik Monsma
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Howard Lem
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.