Teams

FYC - Morreale

2024 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-11vs Eagle Landing - BrinkWon 10
W#3 DoublesMerrill Chandler / Ginger Vanderheyden vs Jody Vance Cabrera / Eden Payton4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-03-10vs San Jose - WiseWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Christy / Merrill Chandler vs BETSEY WINSLOW / Erica Kirk6-4, 6-1
2024-02-11vs Williams Y - TiefenthalerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMerrill Chandler / Beth Kane vs Denise Fricke / Jenni Westbrook7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2024-01-28Won 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Christy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-01-21vs Sawgrass - TobyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMerrill Chandler / Ginger Vanderheyden vs Lisa Pella / Aisling Toby4-6, 2-6
2024-01-14vs Julington Creek - BermanLost 01
L#1 DoublesGinger Vanderheyden / Merrill Chandler vs Karen Berman / Debra Kincaid5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Beth Kane
published 4
3.25
Kim Clontz
published
3.24
Tammy Morreale
published
3.22
Ashley Brockman
published 3.5
3.10
Dawn Crawford
published 3.5
3.09
Elsa Scagel
published
3.09
Amy Christy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Ginger Vanderheyden
published
2.86
Merrill Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Catherine Stiefel
published
Susan Vansandt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Vanderheyden + Tammy Morreale123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Christy + Tammy Morreale213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Kane
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
Kim Clontz
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Tammy Morreale
24W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.24
3.5
Ashley Brockman
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Dawn Crawford
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
Elsa Scagel
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Amy Christy
33W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
Ginger Vanderheyden
4W–19L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Merrill Chandler
18W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Christine Nichols
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Catherine Stiefel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Vansandt
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.