Teams

The Manor (Amy Amick)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Business Women (Tuesday PM) · 3.5 Women (Elena Cosper)

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings20 teams · 3.5 Women (Elena Cosper)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fieldstone (Andrea Brown)*601537120
2USTA Atlanta/Nicole Rothwell6014410120
3White Columns (Kristin Walsh)*5113511123
4McGhee (Xena Whittier)*5112617188
5Rock Springs (Mimi Su)*4213515163
6Brookstone CC (Lesley Muff)*4212615148
7Deerlake (Angela Morgan)*4211719174
8Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)*3311717169
9Wexford (Arrie Lugar)*3310817178
10USTA Atlanta/Jenny Lee3310818162
11The Manor (Irina Muskovitz)*3381021184
12TPC Sugarloaf (Sandy Read)*2410818166
13Rockdale (Dana Harvey)*2471125217
14Sibley Forest (Jonna Miller)*2461225196
15Wild Timber (Keri McCorvey)*2461227206
16Sugar Creek (Dianna Kelly)*2461227214
17Dunwoody North (Claire Botsch)*2441429211
18The Manor (Amy Amick)*1551327204
19Three Chimneys Farm (Heather Stang)*1551327222
20Mayfair St Clair (Carolina Kaminski)*0621633222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Rhonda Ozor
published
3.42
Renee Radi
published
3.30
Marina Stabner
published
3.28
Amy Amick
published 3.5
3.28
Avrielle Ragghianti
published 3.5
3.27
Lisa Cottick
published
3.26
Jaqueline Zacharko
published
3.23
Amy McGruder
published 3.5
3.22
Stefanie McElheny
published
3.12
Birgit Maffucci
published 3.5
3.04
Ileana Chu
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Amick + Marina Stabner4164% games+16.3% vs expected
Jaqueline Zacharko + Marina Stabner7360% games+14.8% vs expected
Amy McGruder + Rhonda Ozor3644% games+4.9% vs expected
Stefanie McElheny + Marina Stabner7160% games+2.0% vs expected
Amy Amick + Stefanie McElheny3451% games+0.2% vs expected
Jaqueline Zacharko + Stefanie McElheny6655% games+0.0% vs expected
Amy Amick + Lisa Cottick4449% games−3.5% vs expected
Amy Amick + Avrielle Ragghianti71546% games−3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rhonda Ozor
82W–75L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Renee Radi
23W–11L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
Marina Stabner
69W–35L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Amy Amick
51W–51L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Avrielle Ragghianti
52W–40L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
Lisa Cottick
45W–40L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Jaqueline Zacharko
31W–29L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Amy McGruder
56W–48L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Stefanie McElheny
44W–30L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Birgit Maffucci
55W–46L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ileana Chu
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.