Teams

Woodruff-3.5W-JXN

2026 Team Singles Tournament-PB · 3.5 W

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-01vs Vickers-3.5W-DeltaWon 20
W#2 SinglesEmma Bond vs Brianne DeLoach6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesCecil Patton vs Madalyne Wolfe Johnson6-3, 6-2
2026-03-01vs Adamo-3.5W-GCWon 20
W#1 SinglesCecil Patton vs Delynsi Che6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTiffany Gore vs Katie Brandon6-1, 6-4
2026-02-28vs Adamo-3.5W-GCWon 30
W#1 SinglesMargaret Wadsworth vs Katie Brandon7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMary Kate Diltz vs Delynsi Che6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesElissa Woodruff vs Angela Vo6-1, 6-2
2026-02-28vs Vickers-3.5W-DeltaWon 20
W#1 SinglesEmma Bond vs Susan Adams6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCecil Patton vs Shelby Ballinger6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Woodruff-3.5W-JXN40111277
2Adamo-3.5W-GC134816106
3Vickers-3.5W-Delta133919125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Cecil Patton
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
Emma Bond
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Margaret Wadsworth
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.39
Elissa Woodruff
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Mary Kate Diltz
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.26
Tiffany Gore
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Margaret Kovar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Gore + Elissa Woodruff314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cecil Patton
28W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Emma Bond
59W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Margaret Wadsworth
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Elissa Woodruff
37W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Mary Kate Diltz
56W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Tiffany Gore
36W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Margaret Kovar
24W–30L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.