Teams

1-JMontague CCC

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-11vs 2-MAlimohammadi-EnoWon 10
W#2 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Alex Stoffregen6-1, 6-2
2022-05-04vs 3-KBuckel-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Rick Edmunds vs Marvin Davis / Aaron Young6-2, 6-2
2022-04-27vs 4-MBLAND-CHTCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Andrew Chan0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRick Edmunds / Travis Angle vs John Hess / Alan Furan7-6, 6-0
2022-04-20vs 5-TMiller-CHCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesRick Edmunds / Robert Long vs Steve Travers / Aaron Meadows6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarcus Curry / Arash Chehrazi vs Michael Sapeta / Doug Holroyd6-2, 6-3
2022-04-13Won 10
W#2 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Ryan Soles6-2, 6-1
2022-04-11vs 4-MBLAND-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Rick Edmunds vs Mark Bland / John Hess7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-04vs 5-TMiller-CHCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Tom Wollman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRick Edmunds / Travis Angle vs Steve Travers / Doug Holroyd6-1, 6-2
2022-03-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Robert Long Jr0-6, 1-6
2022-03-02vs 2-MAlimohammadi-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Rick Edmunds vs Andy MacKelfresh / Mohammad Alimohammadi6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Elliot Mamet6-2, 6-0
2022-02-23vs 3-KBuckel-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesRick Edmunds / Travis Angle vs Stephen Pysnik / Michael Andre2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
JAMES MONTAGUE
published 3.5
3.32
Arash Chehrazi
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
Conor O'Neill
published 3.5
2.96
Rick Edmunds
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.86
Robert Long
published
2.83
2.75
Travis Angle
published
Brent Fox
published 3
Stephen Arrowood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Long + Rick Edmunds3642% games−3.2% vs expected
Rick Edmunds + Arash Chehrazi224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
JAMES MONTAGUE
29W–43L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Arash Chehrazi
87W–57L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Conor O'Neill
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Rick Edmunds
77W–93L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
Robert Long
21W–47L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Christopher LeGrand
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Travis Angle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Brent Fox
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Arrowood
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.