Teams

Eccles Fuzzy Yellow Ballerz

2025 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 3.0M

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-18vs Salt Lake Tennis-FolletteSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMax Wasilewski / Evan Mcdaniel vs Dylan Richardson / Hamza Qadeer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNate Moore vs Charles Crowther2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJonas Phillips / Dallin Sheldon vs Mark Follette / Tomas Barrera0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesZach Bartlett / Lein Pouwer vs Ethan Lee / Rick Cromar7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-13vs Liberty Park-VisserSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMax Wasilewski / STEVE MATSEN vs Hugh Palmer / Chi-Tai Tang6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesZach Bartlett / Nate Moore vs Samuel Bant / Craig Chytraus3-6, 6-7
2025-10-11vs Liberty Park-BalchSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMax Wasilewski / STEVE MATSEN vs Shane Hanks / Samin Kandoth7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAndy Merrill / Zach Bartlett vs Ken Holleman / Ford Berry0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-27vs Ogden-Porter/JexLost 03
L#1 SinglesNate Moore vs Logan Cole0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEddie Fung / STEVE MATSEN vs Jeff Neuberger / Frederick Partey1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDallin Sheldon / Zach Bartlett vs Robb Wright / Carsten Lau4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-20vs SunPro-HenryWon 10
W#2 DoublesZach Bartlett / STEVE MATSEN vs Kevin Bunker / Dave Hoffman6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-13vs Sports Mall-Nelson/BachmanWon 20
W#2 DoublesDan Murray / Nate Moore vs Arasu Gopinath / Dean Bachman6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMax Wasilewski / STEVE MATSEN vs Rick Killpack / Matt Lyon6-2, 6-2
2025-09-11vs SLTHC #1-SmithLost 12
L#1 SinglesNate Moore vs Todd Judice6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDali Licul / Max Wasilewski vs Casey Buxton / Michael Keough6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJonas Phillips / Lein Pouwer vs Charles Wilson / Michael Kuncewitch1-6, 2-6
2025-08-23vs Liberty Park-YardbirdsLost 03
L#1 SinglesNate Moore vs Christopher Primeau7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSTEVE MATSEN / Jonas Phillips vs Sean Collins / David Noyce5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEddie Fung / Dallin Sheldon vs Vicente Huamani / Andy Larsen2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ogden-Porter/Jex62181432268
2Eccles Fuzzy Yellow Ballerz53171535279
3Sports Mall-Nelson/Bachman53161636288
4SLTHC #1-Smith43161227230
5Salt Lake Tennis-Follette44171536281
6Liberty Park-Yardbirds44151739283
7SunPro-Henry35141839284
8Liberty Park-Balch26141841310
9Sports Mall-Law26122043307

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andy Merrill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Dali Licul
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.06
Max Wasilewski
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.04
Carl Culver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Dan Murray
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3
2.83
Nate Moore
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.80
Zach Bartlett
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.80
Eddie Fung
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
STEVE MATSEN
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.76
Evan Mcdaniel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Jonas Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Dallin Sheldon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Lein Pouwer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nate Moore + Max Wasilewski5160% games+11.4% vs expected
STEVE MATSEN + Max Wasilewski5167% games+4.9% vs expected
Lein Pouwer + Jonas Phillips3545% games−1.1% vs expected
STEVE MATSEN + Eddie Fung2345% games−10.9% vs expected
Carl Culver + Dali Licul6060% gamesnot enough data
Carl Culver + STEVE MATSEN3248% gamesnot enough data
Dan Murray + Dali Licul314 matchesnot enough data
Dali Licul + STEVE MATSEN314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andy Merrill
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dali Licul
64W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Max Wasilewski
24W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Carl Culver
51W–41L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Dan Murray
109W–127L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Nate Moore
16W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Zach Bartlett
19W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Eddie Fung
68W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
STEVE MATSEN
43W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
Evan Mcdaniel
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Jonas Phillips
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Dallin Sheldon
10W–10L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Lein Pouwer
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.