Teams

KY/LOU/DALTON

2026 USTA COMBO 40 & OVER LOUISVILLE · 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.12 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 6 played
Sep 12 12:00 PM
Blairwood Tennis Swim & Fitness Club
Sep 20 1:00 PM
Plainview Tennis Center
Sep 26 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Lindagarde DaltonKimberly Polter
2026-08-30vs KY/LOU/WEIDMAN/GORDINIERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTammy Pollock / Mechelle Kaufman vs Amy Gunn / Heather Richardson6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLindagarde Dalton / Kimberly Polter vs Melissa Weidman / Christine Cahoe3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-22vs KY/LOU/MCCOY/WINEBRENNERLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Johnson / Katherine Louis vs Vicki Black / Kim Riley4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMechelle Kaufman / Mashelle Kiggins vs Janet Kanzinger / Karen Thomas4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Conder / Bettye Wright vs Gentry Fontana / Karen George2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-08vs KY/LOU/STEEN/JORDENWon 20
W#1 DoublesCecelia Bland / Christine Montgomery vs Stacia Cox / Caroline Elliott0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMechelle Kaufman / Mashelle Kiggins vs Kristy Dugan / Nicole Jones-Latka6-3, 6-4
2026-08-02vs KY/LOU/MCCLAINLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Conder / Mechelle Kaufman vs Karyn Dees / Jenny Gunderson0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Polter / Christine Montgomery vs Kathleen Lane / Sonja Bareiss3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Griffin / Bettye Wright vs Elizabeth Curtin / Jill Ramsey7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-24vs KY/LOU/WEIDMAN/GORDINIERLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Montgomery / Karen Griffin vs Amy Gunn / Laura Neely5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMary Conder / Mechelle Kaufman vs Christine Cahoe / Amy Reynolds6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Polter / Karen Weathers vs Deanna Gordinier / Elizabeth Torp3-6, 3-6
2026-07-18vs KY/LOU/MCCOY/WINEBRENNERWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Tan / Thuy Murphy vs Gentry Fontana / Lihui Bai4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Griffin / Mechelle Kaufman vs Shannon Overton / Nancy Jones1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Montgomery / Kim Johnson vs Lynne Haas / Michelle Winebrenner6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Tammy Pollock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Lauren Tan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Mashelle Kiggins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Cecelia Bland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Katherine Louis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Mary Conder
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Thuy Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Karen Weathers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Kimberly Polter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Mechelle Kaufman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Christine Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Bettye Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Lindagarde Dalton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Polter + Cecelia Bland7166% games+14.6% vs expected
Mechelle Kaufman + Karen Weathers4455% games+10.9% vs expected
Mary Conder + Mechelle Kaufman4163% games+5.3% vs expected
Bettye Wright + Thuy Murphy4159% games+3.0% vs expected
Christine Montgomery + Katherine Louis5158% games+2.0% vs expected
Lindagarde Dalton + Kimberly Polter2354% games+1.8% vs expected
Bettye Wright + Christine Montgomery4552% games+1.6% vs expected
Christine Montgomery + Karen Weathers14654% games+0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Pollock
80W–104L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Lauren Tan
37W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Mashelle Kiggins
36W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Cecelia Bland
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Katherine Louis
56W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Mary Conder
28W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.06
Thuy Murphy
50W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
Karen Weathers
50W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Kimberly Polter
44W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
Mechelle Kaufman
75W–79L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Christine Montgomery
85W–84L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Courtney Corrigan
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Bettye Wright
18W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Lindagarde Dalton
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.