Teams

Ro.Brown18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-08vs Ga.Fye18CSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJohn Markham / Marcus Tuttle vs Matthew Durbin / Jeffrey Rini6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAdam Dailey / Graham Stallings vs Mike Uhland / Jonathan Howarth6-1, 6-3
2023-10-01vs Jo.Nance18CWon 20
W#2 DoublesMarcus Tuttle / Lloyd Brown vs Garrett Lovejoy / Nick Strope6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Vander Vennet / Graham Stallings vs Bill Walsh / Joel Nance6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2023-09-24vs Ga.Fye18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndy Schrader / Lloyd Brown vs Gary Fye / Chris Wandor6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJordan Yelverton / Marcus Tuttle vs Charley Yu / Hamilton Garvey6-0, 6-1
2023-09-19vs Ed.King18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndy Schrader / John Markham vs Matt Vaughn / Cameron Burch6-1, 6-3
2023-09-07vs Jo.Hoomani18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndy Schrader / Jonathan Chappell vs Gregory Beyer / Eric Moritz6-4, 6-0
2023-08-27vs Ev.Fultz18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarcus Tuttle / Lloyd Brown vs John Gouveia / Kyle Faltisco4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAndy Schrader / Adam Dailey vs Patrick Graney / Brent Townsend4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-20vs Ro.Elliott18CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLloyd Brown / Marcus Tuttle vs Sean Krause / Stephen Guy6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Vander Vennet / Andy Schrader vs Howard Critcher / Scott Lundy6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-13vs Jo.Nance18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Dailey / Andy Schrader vs Bobby Hammond / Jeffrey Altneu6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Adam Dailey
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.61
Lloyd Brown
published
3.51
Jordan Yelverton
published
3.48
John Markham
published
3.47
Marcus Tuttle
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
John Vander Vennet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Charles Foy
published 3.5
3.22
Andy Schrader
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Schrader + Marcus Tuttle12364% games+10.2% vs expected
John Vander Vennet + Andy Schrader134 matchesnot enough data
Adam Dailey + Lloyd Brown303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Dailey
148W–68L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.92
Lloyd Brown
16W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.61
Jordan Yelverton
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
John Markham
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.48
3.5
Marcus Tuttle
80W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
John Vander Vennet
81W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Charles Foy
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Andy Schrader
86W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.