Teams

Yellow Fuzz Balls

2021 Adult 18 and Over League · 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-05vs 18 & Then SomeWon 41
W#1 DoublesRaymond Bolanos / Matthew Inouye vs Norman O'Connor / Keith Yasui6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMena Ghbrial vs Julian Julian4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJeremy Piamonte / Abel Siu Ho vs Russell Anderson / George Uedoi6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTerence Leong vs Predrag Miocinovic6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarl Gao / Ryan Erik Lam vs Michael Ho / Reid Fukuya7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-29vs 18 & Then SomeWon 40
W#1 DoublesTyler Hopkins / Bon Jovy Smith vs Russell Anderson / Keith Yasui6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRaymond Bolanos / Terence Leong vs Gary Hartman / Reid Fukuya6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMena Ghbrial vs Predrag Miocinovic6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristopher Ricketts / Abel Siu Ho vs Jared Lum / George Uedoi3-0
2021-05-22vs 18 & Then SomeWon 31
W#1 DoublesRaymond Bolanos / Jeremy Piamonte vs Norman O'Connor / Keith Yasui6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMatthew Inouye vs Julian Julian6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Ricketts / Abel Siu Ho vs Russell Anderson / Daryl Fukunaga6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMena Ghbrial vs Reid Fukuya6-2, 6-2
2021-05-15vs 18 & Then SomeWon 40
W#1 DoublesRaymond Bolanos / Matthew Inouye vs Michael Ho / Predrag Miocinovic6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMena Ghbrial vs Gary Hartman6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTyler Hopkins / Terence Leong vs Norman O'Connor / Keith Yasui6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRyan Erik Lam / Jeremy Piamonte vs Daryl Fukunaga / George Uedoi6-1, 6-2
2021-05-08vs 18 & Then SomeWon 31
W#1 DoublesTyler Hopkins / Christopher Ricketts vs Daryl Fukunaga / George Uedoi6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMatthew Inouye vs Michael Ho6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRyan Erik Lam / Abel Siu Ho vs Predrag Miocinovic / Keith Yasui6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarl Gao / Jeremy Piamonte vs Russell Anderson / Norman O'Connor2-6, 5-7
2021-05-01vs 18 & Then SomeWon 41
L#1 DoublesTerence Leong / Bon Jovy Smith vs Michael Ho / Predrag Miocinovic3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesTyler Hopkins vs Jared Lum6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Ricketts / Carl Gao vs Daryl Fukunaga / George Uedoi3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMena Ghbrial vs Reid Fukuya6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRyan Erik Lam / Jeremy Piamonte vs Russell Anderson / Gary Hartman7-5, 6-1
2021-04-24vs 18 & Then SomeWon 41
W#1 DoublesTyler Hopkins / Christopher Ricketts vs Daryl Fukunaga / George Uedoi6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRaymond Bolanos vs Michael Ho6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTerence Leong / Abel Siu Ho vs Gary Hartman / Keith Yasui6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMatthew Inouye vs Predrag Miocinovic6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRyan Erik Lam / Bon Jovy Smith vs Julian Julian / Norman O'Connor6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yellow Fuzz Balls7027818187
218 & Then Some0772858402

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Matthew Inouye
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
3.30
Tyler Hopkins
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.29
Abel Siu Ho
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Christopher Ricketts
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Terence Leong
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.08
Ryan Erik Lam
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.04
Jeremy Piamonte
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Mena Ghbrial
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Raymond Bolanos
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abel Siu Ho + Terence Leong5261% games+7.7% vs expected
Matthew Inouye + Raymond Bolanos4839% games−7.1% vs expected
Abel Siu Ho + Matthew Inouye224 matchesnot enough data
Abel Siu Ho + Jeremy Piamonte213 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Inouye + Terence Leong123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Inouye
48W–65L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
Tyler Hopkins
26W–16L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Abel Siu Ho
90W–84L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Christopher Ricketts
18W–21L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Terence Leong
63W–77L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%17%83%
3.13
Ryan Erik Lam
22W–8L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%26%74%
3.08
Jeremy Piamonte
40W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%38%62%
3.04
Mena Ghbrial
17W–14L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Raymond Bolanos
27W–22L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.