Teams

MurdochTaylor/Memphis

2022 Fall Flexible Mixed Doubles · 7.0 Mixed Flex 18 & Over

2 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-10-14vs CoopwoodBann/MemphisWon 10
W#1 Mixed DoublesNatalie Taylor / Daniel Murdoch vs Grace Bann / Ryan Coopwood6-0, 6-1
2022-10-11vs KnightRichter/MemphisWon 10
W#1 Mixed DoublesNatalie Taylor / Daniel Murdoch vs Shelley Richter / Corey Richter7-6, 6-4
2022-09-27vs BlankRude/MemphisWon 10
W#1 Mixed DoublesNatalie Taylor / Daniel Murdoch vs Mandy Rude / Noah Blank6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed Flex 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Daniel Murdoch
published 4
3.53
Natalie Taylor
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Murdoch
41W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
Natalie Taylor
39W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.