Teams

Westwood Caudill

2024 Richmond Flexible Format Women · Richmond Flexible Format Women 6.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.05 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Flexible Format Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Kristin Zach
published
3.16
Anne Trexler
published 3.5
3.13
Kristen Moslow
published
3.06
Jenny Sharrar
published
3.06
Karen Viverette
published
2.97
Sara Sloman
published
2.92
Samantha Wetzel
published
2.90
2.87
Erin Gardner
published 3
2.84
Amelia Lovette
published 3
2.84
Elizabeth Brogan
published 3
2.70
2.65
2.63
Caroline Caudill
published 3
2.60
Courtney White
published 3
2.50
Carleen DiMeglio
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Sommardahl + Elizabeth Brogan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Zach
34W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Anne Trexler
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
Kristen Moslow
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jenny Sharrar
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.06
Karen Viverette
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Sara Sloman
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.97
Samantha Wetzel
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Frances Wilkinson
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Erin Gardner
13W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Amelia Lovette
23W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Elizabeth Brogan
21W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Catherine Stanley
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Ashley Sommardahl
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Caroline Caudill
7W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Courtney White
16W–20L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Carleen DiMeglio
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.