Teams

SoCal/Le/Mixed55&Over8.0

2022 OC 55 & Over Mixed Doubles · OC WE 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-13vs OC Coto De Caza - KeithWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Char / Hung Vu vs Kevin Nevala / Ulrike Leivici6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan / Julien Do vs Brian McDonald / Vicki Hanna6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Muranaka / Kien Johnson vs Sharon Diekneit / Steve Eperthener6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKaren Char / Hung Vu vs Elaine Diiorio / William Jeff6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKieu-Nhi Nina Le / Kien Johnson vs Sharon Diekneit / Andrew Dylla7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLoc NGUYEN / Katie Huyen vs Arthur Chen / Jane Caldito6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHung Vu / Karen Char vs Placido MacAraeg / Tai Sisson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulien Do / Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan vs Sony Soegiarto / Khin Aye6-2, 6-3
2022-10-02vs OC Coto De Caza - KeithWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan / Julien Do vs Ulrike Leivici / Kevin Nevala7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMary DeVlugt / Kien Johnson vs Elaine Diiorio / William Jeff6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC WE 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Karen Char
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.03
Frank Tran
published 4.5
3.97
Katie Huyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
3.79
Giao Do
published 4
3.76
Kien Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Ben Phan
published 4
3.66
Mary DeVlugt
published
3.52
Jill Muranaka
published
2.98
Diann Burns
published 3.5
Jon Wang
published
Julien Do
published
Kieu-Nhi Nina Le
published
Timothy Ching
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Karen Char
225W–84L career · 3 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.54
4.5
Frank Tran
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
4.03
4
Katie Huyen
90W–34L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan
149W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
Kathy Zepeda Emerzian
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Giao Do
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Kien Johnson
82W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Ben Phan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary DeVlugt
16W–14L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Jill Muranaka
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.52
3.5
Diann Burns
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jon Wang
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julien Do
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kieu-Nhi Nina Le
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Timothy Ching
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.