Teams

EST:Richardson

2021 VT Tri-Level Women · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-11-21vs MIT:MarshallWon 10
W#1 DoublesChaska Richardson / Lori Roberts vs Victoria Luksch / Sara Marshall6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2021-11-14vs OC:The Diehards:YostWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim McManus / Chaska Richardson vs Rebecca Foulk / Kathy Yost7-5, 6-1
2021-11-13vs MIT:MarshallLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Maura Wygmans vs Sara Marshall / Victoria Luksch1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-11-06vs OC:The Diehards:YostWon 10
W#1 DoublesChaska Richardson / Lori Roberts vs Rosa Affleck / Judith Jackson7-5, 3-2
2021-10-31vs ESB:StrausserLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaura Wygmans / Kim McManus vs Lisa Strausser / Jennifer Weiss6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2021-10-24vs OC:The Slice Girls:MaislenWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Lori Roberts vs Malgorzata Donnelly / Nancy Merrill6-3, 6-1
2021-10-23vs ESB:StrausserLost 01
L#1 DoublesChaska Richardson / Jeanne Blackmore vs Page Frantz / Jennifer Weiss1-6, 6-7
2021-10-02vs OC:The Slice Girls:MaislenWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Maura Wygmans vs Malgorzata Donnelly / Elizabeth Maislen7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Maura Wygmans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Kim McManus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Jeanne Blackmore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Chaska Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maura Wygmans + Jeanne Blackmore14858% games+6.8% vs expected
Chaska Richardson + Jeanne Blackmore134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maura Wygmans
34W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Kim McManus
40W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Jeanne Blackmore
65W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Chaska Richardson
23W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.