Teams

SGV We R Game-Scholtz-Live Oaks/SU2

2023 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesChristine Pedroza / Leilani Scholtz vs Stephanie Johnson / Barb Vetterick6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLeilani Scholtz / Karissa Chabner Adams vs Christy Loun Pruszynski / Patricia Ash3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesChristine Pedroza / Leilani Scholtz vs Juliette Roberts / Joyce Zhu3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesChristine Pedroza / Khanh Oberley vs Bianca Li / Stefani Galvagni6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHilary MacGregor / Leilani Scholtz vs Camille Farnsworth / DARCELIA WILSON5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeilani Scholtz / Hilary MacGregor vs Debbie Carmody / Maribeth F Rodriguez3-6, 0-6
2023-10-14vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Pedroza / Leilani Scholtz vs Demmi Setyono / Jill Jobran4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesChristine Pedroza / Karla Thompson vs Nohely Mejia / Patricia McNulty1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesKhanh Oberley / Christine Pedroza vs Grace Eleyae / Christy Loun Pruszynski1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAlice Markowski / Josey Iannotti vs Susan Brosche / Eloina Aguilar6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Hilary MacGregor
published
2.88
Christine Pedroza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Alice Markowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Leilani Scholtz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jennifer Madden
published
Khanh Oberley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leilani Scholtz + Christine Pedroza033 matchesnot enough data
Christine Pedroza + Hilary MacGregor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hilary MacGregor
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.06
3
Christine Pedroza
39W–40L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Alice Markowski
70W–69L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Leilani Scholtz
20W–37L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Jennifer Madden
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Khanh Oberley
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.