Teams

V - Malibu Smokin Aces

2023 USTA Adult 18 &Over - Ventura WE · V - Women 4.0 WE

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-07-09vs V - Royally FunLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaureen Weston / Erin von Watts vs Stacey Iwata / Lorene Miller4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Levin / Michelle Jackson vs Cindy Baw / Rosalind Ng4-6, 6-7
2023-07-01vs V - Out of WACLost 02
L#2 DoublesKathleen Feig / Vicki Levin vs Tanja Daniel / Ramona Halloran1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAlexandria Skouras / Michele Maher vs Annie Farkas / Mary Conversano0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-06-24vs V - Game Set SunsetSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaureen Weston / Mardie Villadiego vs Mia de Leon / Emily Hickey7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichele Maher / Alexandria Skouras vs Sharon Li / Wyne Quinn1-6, 0-6
2023-06-17vs V - Ojai PixiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaureen Weston / Aimee Butcher vs Heidi Bensinger / Annie Mitchell2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-06-10vs V - North Ranch Ace Ace BabyWon 20
W#1 SinglesVicki Levin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichele Maher / Kathleen Feig vs Beth Benton / Angela Reynolds6-2, 6-3
2023-06-04vs V - Sherwood SuperstarsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Jackson / Vicki Levin vs Athene Durrant / Nina Prestidge6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKathleen Feig vs Sofia Nadji6-1, 6-2
2023-05-28vs V - Spanish Hills ContessasLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathleen Feig / Aimee Butcher vs Valerie Tackett / May Barry5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Levin / Michelle Jackson vs Ghazala Trotter / Lynn Meaney4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMonica Bjork / Maureen Weston vs Laine Miller / Jenna Stepp3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKathleen Feig vs Michelle McManigal6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVicki Levin / Mardie Villadiego vs Julie Porrazzo / Debra Jordan5-7, 4-6
2023-05-07vs V - Mission Oaks Kona KrushLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaureen Weston / Mardie Villadiego vs Kirsten Johnston / Marilyn Corbin1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVicki Levin / Amanda Keston vs Lisa Brady / Deanne Saucerman1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-29vs V - Arroyo Vista BumblebeesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaureen Weston / Vicki Levin vs Sheri Kanongataa / Suzie Yamamoto0-6, 1-6
2023-04-23vs V - Royal Court QueensWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Jackson / Maureen Weston vs Courtney Arbuckle / Erica Bachtel6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Women 4.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Thea Lasky
published 4.5
4.04
Kathleen Feig
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.83
Maureen Weston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Erin von Watts
published
3.80
Aimee Butcher
published 4
3.78
Vicki Levin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Monica Bjork
published
3.60
Amanda Keston
published 4
3.55
Rebecca Lobl
published
3.49
Mardie Villadiego
published
3.45
Michelle Jackson
published
3.28
Rory Kennedy
published
3.11
Alexandria Skouras
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kelsey Mckinnon
published
Tina Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicki Levin + Monica Bjork5069% games+6.2% vs expected
Michelle Jackson + Kathleen Feig10757% games+5.0% vs expected
Maureen Weston + Vicki Levin12954% games−1.8% vs expected
Maureen Weston + Kathleen Feig17857% games−15.2% vs expected
Vicki Levin + Kathleen Feig2745% gamesnot enough data
Thea Lasky + Vicki Levin0541% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Weston + Monica Bjork044 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Jackson + Vicki Levin224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Thea Lasky
57W–97L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.13
4
Kathleen Feig
148W–95L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
4.04
4
Maureen Weston
107W–64L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Erin von Watts
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Aimee Butcher
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Vicki Levin
112W–114L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Monica Bjork
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Amanda Keston
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Rebecca Lobl
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Mardie Villadiego
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Michelle Jackson
15W–10L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.45
Rory Kennedy
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Alexandria Skouras
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Kelsey Mckinnon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Jackson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.