Teams

Thies/Weddle

2026 ADULT 65 & OVER SUMMER · 7.0 Women S26

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-23vs StedmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Brown / Janet Czaia vs Jane Alschlager / Lorrie Beckley4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Drake / Michele Weddle vs Cathy Hesse / Mary Newhall1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Micek / Marcie Myers vs Mary Alonso / Sue Stedman6-2, 6-0
2026-06-16vs StedmanLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Czaia / Nancy Brown vs Jane Alschlager / Lori Powell-Knutson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Weddle / Diane Drake vs Elaine Wallace / Lonna Bartsh4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Tresidder / Marcie Myers vs Mary Alonso / Mary Newhall6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-10vs StedmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoan Gustafson / Elizabeth Micek vs Jane Alschlager / Lorrie Beckley6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Rhodus / Michele Weddle vs Mary Alonso / Sheryl McRoberts1-6, 4-6
2026-06-02vs StedmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoan Gustafson / Nancy Brown vs Lori Powell-Knutson / Cathy Hesse6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Kirk / Kathy Lomen vs Elaine Wallace / Lonna Bartsh4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Drake / Linda Morgan vs Sue Stedman / Sheryl McRoberts6-0, 6-2
2026-05-26vs StedmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoan Gustafson / Patricia Rhodus vs Jane Alschlager / Lorrie Beckley0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Brown / Elizabeth Micek vs Cathy Hesse / Linda Oberpriller6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathy Lomen / Debra Tresidder vs Mary Alonso / Lori Powell-Knutson5-7, 1-6
2026-05-19vs StedmanLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoan Gustafson / Patricia Rhodus vs Jane Alschlager / Lori Powell-Knutson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Czaia / Michele Weddle vs Mary Newhall / Cathy Hesse4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Lomen / Debra Tresidder vs Sue Stedman / Mary Alonso6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-12vs StedmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Brown / Marcie Myers vs Jane Alschlager / Lorrie Beckley2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Kirk / Kathy Lomen vs Lonna Bartsh / Elaine Wallace6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Czaia / Michele Weddle vs Cathy Hesse / Linda Oberpriller2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-05vs StedmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoan Gustafson / Janet Czaia vs Jane Alschlager / Linda Oberpriller6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Brown / Marcie Myers vs Sue Stedman / Lorrie Beckley1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Kirk / Kathy Lomen vs Lonna Bartsh / Elaine Wallace3-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Women S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stedman63151230225
2Thies/Weddle2791841251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Elizabeth Micek
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Joan Gustafson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
3.24
Janet Czaia
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Jacqueline Kirk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Debra Tresidder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Marcie Myers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Diane Drake
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Patricia Rhodus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Carol Thies
published 3
Kathy Lomen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Linda Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michele Weddle
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Weddle + Diane Drake2443% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Kirk + Kathy Lomen0545% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Rhodus + Joan Gustafson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Micek
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
Joan Gustafson
43W–68L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Janet Czaia
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Jacqueline Kirk
8W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Debra Tresidder
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Marcie Myers
20W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Diane Drake
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
Patricia Rhodus
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Carol Thies
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Lomen
51W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Morgan
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michele Weddle
7W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.