Teams

JNCC Acing Gracefully

2025 40 & OVER WEEKDAY WOMEN · 3.5 W Thursday

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-30vs FOR FireballsLost 13
W#1 DoublesGeorgia Myers / Teresa Mirarchi vs Kerry Napper / Jacqueline Gross6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeidi Haddock / Kristi Bertelsman vs Kathy Burkholder / Natalie Drayton3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Reed / Amy Wright vs Michelle Pettit / Kelly Grossman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesFiona Payton / Julia Vlahos vs Sheila Gentry / Susan Daum2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Amanda Reed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Heidi Haddock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Georgia Myers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Amy Flowers
published 3.5
Debbie Grieder
published 3.5
Debbie Litton
published 3.5
3.21
Teresa Mirarchi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Jami Painter
published 3.5
3.18
Kristi Bertelsman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Robyn Clement
published
2.88
Fiona Payton
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Roxanne Cossette
published
2.82
Julia Vlahos
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Alice Phillips
published 3
Linda Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Georgia Myers + Teresa Mirarchi134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Reed
41W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Heidi Haddock
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Georgia Myers
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Amy Flowers
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Debbie Grieder
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Debbie Litton
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Mirarchi
12W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Jami Painter
16W–23L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Kristi Bertelsman
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Robyn Clement
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.04
3.5
Fiona Payton
11W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.88
Roxanne Cossette
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.88
Julia Vlahos
6W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Alice Phillips
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Williams
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.