Teams

Eagle Harbor - Keller

2022 Duval Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-26vs Julington Creek - SmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesJose Feliciano / Earl Yates III vs Donn Agraviador / Jeff Prieto6-4, 7-6
2022-09-14vs Duval/Devos (Baymeadows)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJose Feliciano / Brad Robinson vs Eric Leach / H Bryan Neel4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDan Singleton / Peter Cumpstone vs David Smyth / Robert Bitler3-6, 5-7
2022-08-24vs FYC - MorrealeWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Cumpstone / Jose Feliciano vs BRYAN Clontz / Craig Risdon7-6, 6-2
2022-08-10vs Duval/Devos (Baymeadows)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDan Singleton / James Ellisor vs Marcus Hodges / H Bryan Neel2-6, 1-6
2022-07-27vs Julington Creek - SmithLost 02
L#1 DoublesDan Singleton / Earl Yates III vs Thomas Bass / Scott Hiltonen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJose Feliciano / Brad Robinson vs Joao Sarpi / Jeff Prieto3-6, 1-6
2022-07-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Ellisor / Jose Feliciano vs Young Lee / Troy Bryant4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Thomas Keller
published
3.69
Dan Singleton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
James Meekins
published 4
3.66
Steve Andersen
published
3.63
Peter Cumpstone
published
3.62
Gregory Sapp
published 4
3.59
Jose Feliciano
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.25
David Phillips
published 3.5
James Ellisor
published 3.5
3.18
Brad Robinson
published 3.5
Jim Ebener
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Singleton + Jose Feliciano10653% games+3.0% vs expected
Dan Singleton + Thomas Keller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Keller
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Dan Singleton
136W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
James Meekins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Steve Andersen
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Peter Cumpstone
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Gregory Sapp
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
Jose Feliciano
82W–63L career · 5 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
David Phillips
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
James Ellisor
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Brad Robinson
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Jim Ebener
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.