Teams

Kickin Aces

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY · Ladies 4.0 18s

19 players · average NTRP 3.90 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-11-15vs NetchixWon 31
W#1 DoublesAdria Sheth / Gabrielle James vs Amy Springer / Karin Petersen6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesShelley Daddurno vs Karie Pettinati6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Benardete / Maribel Sierra vs Jennifer Hempel / Marian Adrian6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSara Smithhart / Rhonda Martin vs Sharon Henderson / Cassie Ford2-6, 2-6
2023-11-01vs Austin AcesSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAngelle Chaney / Adria Sheth vs Clasine Dickson / Terri Rose4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCristina Albarran vs Madison Brimer3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesNicole Benardete / Maribel Sierra vs Janet Repass / Lisa Diedrich6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSara Smithhart / Tanya Clement vs Susan Harmon / Cecilia Griffis3-6, 4-6
2023-10-04vs Tough LoveLost 12
L#1 DoublesAdria Sheth / Angelle Chaney vs Julia Roadman / Morgan Angelone3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMaribel Sierra / Nicole Benardete vs Linda Henson / Holly Paulson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana Hillary / Heidi Henderson vs Cristina Canepa / Victoria Smith1-6, 4-6
2023-09-20vs Naughty by NETureWon 41
W#1 DoublesAdria Sheth / Gabrielle James vs Susan Stahelin / Heather Fernandez-Stoll6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesShelley Daddurno vs Brandi Boucvalt6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaribel Sierra / Nicole Benardete vs Kimberly Lenz / Janice Trentacosti6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTanya Clement vs Shannon Weisblatt1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Liao / Maureen Martin vs Kristin Wolf / Natalia Ruffa-Messler6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 4.0 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Gabrielle James
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Nicole Benardete
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Shelley Daddurno
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Anjie Frost
published 4
Chris Scott
published 4
Dyan Rody
published 4
3.72
Cristina Albarran
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.69
Adria Sheth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Dianna Rice
published 4
3.68
Maribel Sierra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Tanya Clement
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.58
Sara Smithhart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Dana Hillary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Linda Liao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Brenda Payne
published 3.5
Erika Wulff
published 3.5
Julie Jumonville
published
Maureen Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tonya Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Smithhart + Maribel Sierra6058% games+6.8% vs expected
Adria Sheth + Gabrielle James11854% games+2.7% vs expected
Sara Smithhart + Adria Sheth10356% games+2.4% vs expected
Nicole Benardete + Maribel Sierra17953% games−0.1% vs expected
Chris Scott + Dana Hillary1444% games−1.7% vs expected
Tanya Clement + Dianna Rice5948% games−4.3% vs expected
Tanya Clement + Shelley Daddurno3248% games−5.4% vs expected
Maureen Martin + Shelley Daddurno4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gabrielle James
62W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
Nicole Benardete
48W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
Shelley Daddurno
67W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Anjie Frost
21W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Chris Scott
22W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Dyan Rody
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Cristina Albarran
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Adria Sheth
77W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Dianna Rice
33W–30L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Maribel Sierra
46W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Tanya Clement
38W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Sara Smithhart
50W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Dana Hillary
11W–39L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
Linda Liao
21W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Brenda Payne
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Erika Wulff
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Jumonville
29W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Martin
28W–26L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tonya Williams
20W–23L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.