Teams

IE-MTC-Duncan

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Men 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-08vs IE-Elevenis-NgoWon 21
W#1 DoublesAaron Cobbe / Jose Vargas vs Matthew Boland / Brian Lee6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWayne Payton / Giri Dwara vs Anh Tran / Ken Tomoyasu1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Duncan / Jim Toth vs Phi Ngo / Vu Le6-4, 6-4
2025-10-19vs IE-Elevenis-NgoLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Krejci / Jose Vargas vs Charles Chaya / Truong Quach3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Duncan / Jeff Cane vs Jinjun Tong / Humberto Salcido0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRoyce Haggard / Mark Bentley vs Kevin Dang / Brian Lee2-6, 2-6
2025-10-05vs IE-RCC-LiLost 02
L#1 DoublesJose Vargas / Robert Krejci vs Hong Ye / Ricardo Gutierres2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Bentley / David Duncan vs Dan Zhuo / Xinke Chen3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aaron Cobbe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Giri Dwara
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
David Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Robert Krejci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Wayne Payton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Jeff Cane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Toth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jose Vargas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Bentley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Royce Haggard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Zachary Loczi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Krejci + Jose Vargas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aaron Cobbe
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Giri Dwara
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
David Duncan
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Robert Krejci
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Wayne Payton
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Jeff Cane
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Jim Toth
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jose Vargas
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Bentley
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Royce Haggard
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Loczi
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.